Randall Benton / RBenton@sacbee.com

Though unintentional budgeting errors are blamed for huge surpluses of cash accumulating to the state Parks and Recreation Department, an audit by the state attorney general released today department personnel deliberately tried to keep from reporting the money.

0 comments | Print

Parks officials made 'conscious, deliberate' effort to hide money, probe finds

Published: Friday, Jan. 4, 2013 - 12:47 pm
Last Modified: Thursday, Feb. 14, 2013 - 7:42 am

The massive hidden surplus of cash uncovered in 2012 at the California Department of Parks and Recreation apparently began with unintended budget errors, and not intentional misconduct, according to a long-awaited investigation by the state attorney general released today.

However, investigators determined there was a "conscious and deliberate" effort not to report the surplus to the Department of Finance, as required by state budget rules. This occurred, the investigation found, over many years and as high up in the organization as chief deputy director Michael Harris, the No. 2 in command. Harris was fired in July when the surplus came to light.

The report was ordered by the state Natural Resources Agency after officials determined that managers at state parks headquarters in Sacramento had secretly hidden $54 million in two special funds for more than 12 years. The revelation, along with an earlier scandal involving an unauthorized vacation buyout program at parks headquarters, was first reported by The Sacramento Bee in July.

The attorney general interviewed 40 people at the department. Notably absent is Ruth Coleman, the former state parks director who resigned in July. She refused to be interviewed on the advice of her attorney.

Documents released Friday include the 140-page investigation and more than 2,000 pages of interview transcripts. The investigation finds that the surplus money "apparently began and grew as a result of unintended errors" and not as a result of "intentional conduct." Investigators also found no evidence that any of the money was used for any "surreptitious expenditure."

Officials at the Natural Resources Agency, which oversees state parks, are still reviewing the voluminous report, said spokesman Richard Stapler. Among other things, they are looking to see if any criminal acts occurred. If so, further action would be referred to a local law enforcement agency, Stapler said.

"We need to carefully review it and make a determination if we need to refer anything to local law enforcement," Stapler said. "We haven't made any determination yet."

The full report can be found online here.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Matt Weiser



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals