Charles Dharapak / Associated Press file, 2011

Marine Gen. John Allen, the top commander in Afghanistan, has been cleared in an investigation linked to the Petraeus scandal.

0 comments | Print

General cleared in email investigation linked to Petraeus scandal

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 6A
Last Modified: Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013 - 7:56 am

WASHINGTON – The top general in Afghanistan has been cleared in an email scandal that had threatened his career just as he was putting the finishing touches on plans for the American military drawdown in the 11-year-old war.

The Pentagon inspector general removed the cloud that had been hanging over Marine Gen. John Allen since last fall, according to Pentagon spokesman George Little, when he got caught up in the scandal that short-circuited the superstar career of retired general and former CIA Director David Petraeus.

Little said that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who requested the inquiry into Allen, "was pleased to learn that allegations of professional misconduct were not substantiated by the investigation. The secretary has complete confidence in the continued leadership of Gen. Allen, who is serving with distinction in Afghanistan."

There was no announcement on whether the exoneration would put Allen's expected next post as the U.S. supreme commander for Europe back on track.

His nomination had been sidetracked by allegations that he exchanged improper emails with a Tampa, Fla., socialite, Jill Kelley, who was well-known for organizing social events at MacDill Air Force Base, home to the U.S. Central Command. Allen served as second-in-command at Centcom before becoming head of all allied forces in Afghanistan more than a year ago, following Petraeus in that post.

The general's troubles grew out of revelations of an extramarital affair between Petraeus and his biographer, Paula Broadwell, which led to Petraeus' resignation from the CIA. Both are married.

Broadwell allegedly contacted Allen to warn him about Kelley. But Allen alerted Kelley to the warning, and Kelley asked a friend in the FBI to look into it.

The emails between Allen and Kelley, both of whom are married, were described by Defense Department officials at the time as "beyond flirtatious, and can probably be described safely as suggestive."

They were first described as numbering about 30,000 pages. But the actual number of emails was in the hundreds and sent over a period of years, according to officials.

The inspector general determined they did not add up to conduct unbecoming to an officer. As the email story unfolded, President Barack Obama praised Allen's record of service and noted he had seen nothing indicating that the emails compromised national security.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Matthew Schofield



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals