0 comments | Print

Lassen federal park officials criticized on fire planning

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 2B
Last Modified: Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013 - 8:01 am

MINERAL – A lightning fire, which escaped from Lassen Volcanic National Park to burn more than 28,000 acres of federal and private lands, taught park and other fire officials the importance of planning for a worst-case scenario and working with a trained interagency team as well as the public.

In a report on last summer's Reading fire, a team of reviewers found fault with the planning, management and coordination of handling the fire, as well as the way information about it was made available to the public.

The reviewers include National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service officials. They recommended that park officials collaborate with other agencies, neighboring communities and the public to ensure greater public safety.

Other recommendations include greater recognition of the changing conditions affecting fire behavior and adjusting fire management to them, according to the report released last week requested by Chris Lehnertz, the Park Service's Pacific West regional director.

Since the early 1990s, Lassen Park officials have been using natural and prescribed fires to improve wildlife habitat and reduce the fuels that have built up over nearly a century of fire suppression.

They have successfully burned 15,000 acres of the park in the last 12 years, the report states.

When lightning sparked the Reading fire July 23, park managers saw it as an opportunity to advance a variety of natural resource goals, according to the review.

They planned to hold the fire at the main park highway, preventing it from spreading to the Lassen National Forest and private lands around the community of Old Station.

But the fire jumped the highway Aug. 6, spreading rapidly to the northwest and threatening Old Station. By the time it was contained Aug. 22, the Reading fire had cost $17 million.

While park officials were confident they could manage the fire within the area they defined, they should have planned for a larger, more complex scenario, according to the report.

"Little consideration was given to what if it did not stay within the planning area," the report states.

The reviewers also took Lassen Park to task for delaying information released to the media, local communities and businesses.

"Mixed fire messaging" led to confusion and hampered overall communications. Improved communication would have "enhanced relationships with communities, the media, and elected officials," the reviews said.

ONLINE

The full report on the blaze is available at http://wildfirelessons.net/ documents/Reading_Fire_ Review.pdf

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Jane Braxton Little



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals