Dan Walters

0 comments | Print

Dan Walters: California park funds flap needs closer look

Published: Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013 - 8:16 pm

An old joke goes something like this: A man applies for an accounting job and his would-be employer asks whether he can do double-entry bookkeeping.

"Double-entry?" the applicant replies. "I can do triple-entry. I'll show the business breaking even for your partner, and a loss for the Internal Revenue Service, and tell you the real story."

That's more or less what happened in the state Department of Parks and Recreation, as first laid out in The Bee seven months ago.

For years, department managers had been pleading poverty – and even saying they would have to close some parks to remain solvent – while squirreling money away and giving different numbers to different financial overseers.

Belatedly, the Legislature appears to be finally getting serious – or at least semi- serious – about getting to the bottom of the scandal, a mini-version of which has since been exposed in the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire).

On Tuesday, the Legislature's audit committee delved into a report from the state auditor's office on the parks and recreation imbroglio, along with reports from the Department of Justice, the Department of Finance and the State Controller's Office.

It also heard assurances from the parks department's new director, retired Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Anthony Jackson, about a new "set of values."

That's fine as far as it goes. But it's apparent that the misleading financial reports date back at least to the late 1990s and continued even after bean counters at the Department of Finance noted discrepancies and asked the department to reconcile them more than a decade ago.

There probably wasn't any criminal offense – or at least that's what the Department of Justice concluded. The mysterious millions weren't stolen, diverted into wild parties or anything like that.

Rather, high-ranking department officials hid the money as a hedge against budget cuts or from fear that reporting larger fund balances would imperil appropriations from the Legislature or, it seems, undercut the public appeals for more money to keep parks from closing.

The real effect, therefore, was to undermine public confidence and, perhaps even more importantly, the willingness of volunteer park support groups to raise money to supplement state funds for maintenance of what many consider to be the nation's finest system of state parks.

The Legislature should not stop at airing the after-the-fact investigations and audits that have been conducted in the last seven months. It has subpoena power and should use it to bring past department directors and other high officials into the Capitol to answer, more directly, questions about who decided to hide the money and why.

It's needed to restore luster to a tarnished institution.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Dan Walters



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals