0 comments | Print

Laid-off Sacramento City teachers win partial court victory

Published: Saturday, Mar. 16, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 2B
Last Modified: Sunday, Mar. 17, 2013 - 10:30 am

Scores of laid-off Sacramento teachers who sued last year complaining that their school district ignored seniority-based job protections won a partial victory Friday in Sacramento Superior Court.

Judge Allen Sumner, in a case closely watched by educators and advocacy groups across the state, concluded in a 26-page decision that the Sacramento City Unified School District erred in categorically exempting all teachers at high-need schools from seniority-based layoffs.

But in a decision that gave something to both sides in the case, the court also said the district was permitted to make high-need exceptions to seniority-based layoffs on a case-by-case basis.

The lawsuit filed last year against the Sacramento City Unified School District was the second in two years challenging the district's decision to protect a handful of high-need campuses – labeled Priority Schools – from the effects of teacher turnover by skipping less senior teachers during layoffs.

Jeffrey B. Demain of Altshuler Berzon LLP, one of the San Francisco-based attorneys handling the case for the teachers, said the plaintiffs "agree with the court that the district failed to prove that exceptions to seniority based layoffs were permissible" in a 2012 administrative layoff hearing sought by teachers who had contested their layoffs.

The judge sent the issue back to the district for a case-by-case comparison of training and experience of the affected teachers.

The lead attorney for the district, Gregory A. Wedner, said he was pleased with the decision because it affirmed the concept that the district's Priority Schools "constitute a course of study under the Education Code" and that, when layoffs occur, the district can retain less senior employees better equipped to serve high-need students.

"The judge referred to that in the decision as the key point and the pivotal legal issue," Wedner said. "So from that standpoint, it's a victory. Now the district can move forward with its Priority Schools without having to worry about repeated attacks by teachers."

Demain said the district's re-analysis could produce back pay and benefits for affected workers along with reinstatements.

The district's teachers union filed a similar suit in 2011. That case is still pending.

The judge's decision noted that the district had decided to lay off almost 400 certified employees, including almost 300 K-12 teachers, for the 2012-13 school year due to the district's massive deficit.

Call The Bee's Loretta Kalb, (916) 321-1073. Follow her on Twitter @LorettaSacBee.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Loretta Kalb



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals