Dan Walters

0 comments | Print

Dan Walters: California Legislature 'solving' problems it created

Published: Tuesday, Mar. 19, 2013 - 6:00 pm
Last Modified: Wednesday, Mar. 20, 2013 - 7:43 am

The 2013 session of the California Legislature is nearly four months old, having begun in early December, and lawmakers have done little to earn their salaries and living expense checks.

They've been occupying their - really, our - time with mostly pointless "hearings" on their pet causes and, in the Senate, with a series of lectures from the podium on various topics.

Production of legislation has been scant to the point of near invisibility. But the legislative leadership is fast-tracking a couple of bills, and therein lies a tale.

One measure, Senate Bill 140 by Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, would appropriate $24 million to accelerate the state Department of Justice's program of seizing weapons from felons and mentally ill people who, by law, cannot possess them.

The DOJ has a list of nearly 19,000 such people who possess close to 40,000 firearms, and it grows daily - faster than the department's agents can find and remove the weapons. The problem was being ignored until the Legislature staged a hearing on writing new gun control laws and DOJ representatives complained about a lack of money.

Obviously, it would be embarrassing for the Legislature to write new gun laws when it wasn't appropriating enough money to enforce those already on the books. So the Leno bill was quickly drafted and whisked through the Senate.

SB 140 awaits action in the Assembly, but pro-gun groups are complaining that the $24 million would come from fees on legitimate gun purchasers that are supposed to pay for their background checks.

Diverting those fees into rounding up illicit guns may - or may not - be legal, but it's certainly a questionable practice.

Meanwhile, Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez is fast-tracking a bill to appropriate $2 million to Secretary of State Debra Bowen's office to clear up a backlog of business filings - legislation sparked by a Bee story describing chronic delays in processing business paperwork.

That sounds responsive until one looks at the recent history of the situation. A year and a half ago, Pérez announced, with great fanfare, that the Assembly was shifting $1.2 million from its own budget to speed up processing of business filings, and Bowen declared - wrongly, as it turned out - that the money would erase the backlog.

Meanwhile, however, the Legislature has diverted more than $20 million in business filing fees into the general fund in the last three years to close the state's chronic budget deficit while slashing the budget item for processing "filings and registrations" from $52 million in 2011-12 to $46.4 million this year.

Bottom line: The Perez bill would "solve" a problem that the Legislature itself created by playing budget games - much like it did with the DOJ's gun seizure program.

That's not achievement.

Call The Bee's Dan Walters, (916) 321-1195. Back columns, www.sacbee.com/walters. Follow him on Twitter @WaltersBee.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Dan Walters



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals