Photos Loading
previous next
  • Randall Benton / Bee file, 2003

  • Allen Short is executive director of the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority.

0 comments | Print

Viewpoints: Should state dedicate more flows for salmon? No, plan could hurt San Joaquin Valley farms

Published: Thursday, Mar. 21, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 13A
Last Modified: Friday, Mar. 22, 2013 - 11:54 am

California's 32nd governor is often remembered as the man who built things.

Pat Brown's contributions included freeways, universities and a vast State Water Project that now provides water for 25 million Californians.

Half a century later, his son is hoping to make his own lasting contribution to our water system with the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, or BDCP. Unfortunately, a regulatory sideshow playing out on a parallel track threatens Gov. Jerry Brown's ability to succeed.

This week, the State Water Resources Control Board began public hearings on a proposal calling for major increases in flows on the San Joaquin River, one of two rivers that feed the Delta. The Delta is the fulcrum at the core of our state's water system, and protecting its water quality and native fish populations – salmon, in particular – has been a daunting challenge for multiple administrations.

The BDCP – a colossal, $23 billion plan calling for construction of two 35-mile tunnels – is Brown's answer. But perhaps the state water board, whose members Brown appoints, is not on the same page.

The board's controversial proposal would redirect water supplies away from San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced counties, without any demonstrable benefit to salmon or the rest of the Delta ecosystem. The staff's own impact analysis forecasts "significant and unavoidable" damage to the region's economy. But the fine print is more dire:

• Reductions in water deliveries would fallow 128,000 acres of farmland.

• Agricultural-sector income losses would total $187 million a year, a major hit in a region stuck in a lingering recession.

• With less water and power available, rates for both would rise, further straining households.

• Job losses would exceed 1,200 a year.

• Cuts in hydropower production would create the need to buy costly supplemental power from carbon-producing conventional sources, undermining California's goal of getting 33 percent of its energy from renewable resources.

• To account for lost surface water, users would increase groundwater pumping by about 25 percent, overdrafting the water table and increasing energy use and costs.

If the water board had scientific support to make this costly venture worth the risk, that would be one thing. But it doesn't. The board assumes greater flows will benefit fish but fails to provide any supporting evidence to back it up.

More broadly, this expensive, alarming exercise raises key questions for Brown:

What about the BDCP? Why is the water board pursuing this separate agenda, rather than integrating its efforts on the San Joaquin with the more holistic BDCP approach? What about the Delta Stewardship Council, and its plan? Do any of your people even talk to one another?

That our government agencies are failing to work cooperatively toward a common, well-defined goal is not a new story. But in this case, given the potentially devastating consequences for our region, it merits fresh attention.

Moreover, the governor recently traveled to Colusa, the heart of farm country, and vowed to ensure Delta improvement efforts do not tread on "historic" water rights. We believed him, which makes the water board's insistence on pushing forward with its proposal for the San Joaquin all the more troubling.

Given the concerns, a growing list of state and federal lawmakers, farmers, residents, business owners, labor representatives and community leaders have signed a proclamation urging the board to put on the brakes and rethink its approach.

It's the right thing to do. And for a governor looking to echo his father's legacy of thoughtful management of California's water supply, it's a no-brainer.

Public meeting and comment

A public hearing on the flow proposals for San Joaquin River tributaries started Wednesday and continues today and possibly Friday in the Coastal Hearing Room of the California EPA Building, 1001 I St. in Sacramento. Both hearings start at 9 a.m. You can also read documents and comment until March 29 at: www.waterboards.ca.gov Allen Short is executive director of the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Allen Short



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals