Ann Notthoff is California advocacy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council in San Francisco.

0 comments | Print

Viewpoints: Senate set to gut nation's key law that safeguards the environment

Published: Sunday, Mar. 31, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 5E
Last Modified: Sunday, Mar. 31, 2013 - 7:17 am

When the U.S. military wanted to add more low-level training flights over Joshua Tree National Park, it first undertook an environmental review to assess the impact on the park's 1 million annual visitors, who were already complaining about fighter jets roaring over campgrounds and picnic areas.

Following extensive public comment and detailed consultation with the Park Service, the military came up with a new flight path that not only avoided most of the sensitive parts of the park, but also allowed the pilots to fly lower than before.

Result: a better park experience for visitors and better training for our military.

This happy win-win came about thanks to one of the nation's most important laws to safeguard our quality of life, the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA, which called for the military's review. Known as the "green Magna Carta," NEPA was passed by an overwhelming bipartisan majority and signed into law by President Richard Nixon in 1970.

In the four decades since, NEPA has protected our health, our environment and our right to be heard on decisions that affect our communities, our livelihoods and our future. It promotes responsible use of our natural resources and lands by requiring major government projects to document the risks of development and insisting that we all work together with affected communities to find the best way with the least adverse impact. At the core, it's about government transparency and accountability.

NEPA's common-sense premise is simple: When the federal government undertakes or approves a major project – a dam, a highway, a power plant – it should check to make sure that the project won't have substantial adverse consequences for the environment. An initial Environmental Impact Statement discloses the risks and gives the public a chance to voice objections, suggest improvements and propose alternatives. Agencies are required to heed this input. Time and again the result has been just as the law intended – a better-designed project with less impact and more public support.

Yet some in Congress want to gut this fundamental right to know. They have attacked the act head-on, and they've launched back-door assaults on NEPA through other legislation.

Last year's transportation bill sharply limited NEPA review of major road projects, and now a similar ploy is afoot within the huge Water Resources Development Act, co-authored by Sen. David Vitter, R-La., and California Sen. Barbara Boxer, to effectively roll back other essential NEPA safeguards.

Last week, the Senate Public Works committee approved bill language that strikes at the core of NEPA by sharply tilting the scales toward approval of projects, regardless of potential environmental damage. It sets unreasonably short deadlines for completing reviews, which will inevitably bias agency officials toward rubber-stamping projects to avoid the bill's harsh new fines.

In California, we've faced similar attacks to our state's answer to NEPA, the California Environmental Quality Act. For more than 40 years CEQA has protected the public's right to clean air and water and allowed the public unfettered access to our state's iconic natural landscapes. With CEQA and NEPA, the public's right to know and voice their opinion is always the right course of action to determine the future of our communities and country.

The full Senate should reject this effort to undermine NEPA when the Water Resources Development Act comes to the floor. Proponents say they're just "streamlining" NEPA, but in fact they are steamrolling over the public's right to full participation in government decisions.

NEPA is sound policy that has protected American places iconic and obscure, from California's redwood forests to Maryland's Chesapeake Bay. It established the United States as an environmental leader and has been emulated worldwide. We need to keep it that way.

Ann Notthoff is California advocacy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council in San Francisco.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Ann Notthoff



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals