Election 2012

Ross D. Franklin / AP

From left, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., and Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., \after their tour of the Mexico border with the United States, March 27, 2013, in Nogales, Ariz. They are part of the "Gang of Eight" working on immigration.

0 comments | Print

Immigration plan heads to bill writing – and devilish details

Published: Monday, Apr. 1, 2013 - 4:16 pm
Last Modified: Wednesday, Apr. 3, 2013 - 3:57 am

Politics still might get in the way of a final agreement on a bipartisan immigration bill.

Now that labor and business have agreed on an immigrant temporary-worker program, a bipartisan group of eight senators say they’ve cleared every major policy hurdle and are ready to introduce the most dramatic overhaul to the U.S. immigration system in decades.

But first they have to write the bill, and that’s rarely an easy task.

After weeks of speculation that an agreement was in jeopardy amid stalled talks and public bickering between the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO, Senate staff members are working the plan into draft legislation.

The so-called “gang of eight” senators have worked out the major concepts, including placing the 11 million illegal immigrants who are in the country now on a path to citizenship, beefing up border security, establishing a nationwide system to verify the legal status of workers, punishing businesses that hire illegal immigrants and allowing more agricultural and highly skilled immigrant workers to stay in the country.

But they still may hit several stumbling blocks as broad concepts must be turned into specific details that can sustain legal scrutiny. A key aspect of the proposal, for example, is that the borders must be secure before newly legalized immigrants are put on a path to citizenship. The members must come up with a system to measure border security, and whether they think the borders already are secure enough depends on what side of the aisle they sit on.

The senators also are planning to rewrite the laws to give preference to future immigrants based on potential job skills, with less emphasis on family connections. The system would award points for an immigrant’s various characteristics, and it would place greater emphasis than the system does now on the immigrant’s ability to make long-term economic contributions.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has agreed to consider the bill later this month, according to Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

Schumer, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and other members of the gang of eight took to the airwaves Sunday to herald the historic agreement, announce plans to unveil the legislation next week and call on President Barack Obama to help them make their case to the public.

On Monday, Obama applauded the progress and promised to remain engaged. But he cautioned that the legislation has yet to be presented, Press Secretary Jay Carney said.

“We’re not celebrating prematurely,” Carney said. “We await the product.”

Indeed, one member of the bipartisan team, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., who’s frequently mentioned as a 2016 presidential contender, appeared to be distancing himself from his excited colleagues.

“Reports that the bipartisan group of eight senators have agreed on a legislative proposal are premature,” he said in a statement Sunday.

Rubio faces a dilemma. He’s a favorite of die-hard conservatives, who have a strong say in Republican politics. But if he has national ambitions, he also must show broad appeal, particularly to the center-right, and immigration might be a key part of such a strategy.

Some political observers questioned whether Rubio was trying to lay the groundwork for removing himself from the group, but analysts such as Lance deHaven-Smith said Rubio had too much to lose.

The political science professor at Florida State University described Rubio as acting like a “reluctant bride.”

Rubio can’t afford to lose Hispanic support by walking away from the agreement, deHaven said.

“But on the other hand, if he rushes to this with open arms and culminates the marriage with glee, he alienates the tea party. He’s going to the altar with his head down and shuffling,” the professor said.

The “gang of eight” senators began crafting ideas for an immigration overhaul after the November elections, in which Hispanics voted overwhelmingly for Obama over Republican Mitt Romney.

The agreed-on guest worker proposal initially would provide 20,000 visas. The numbers would increase later, based on market demands and unemployment numbers, but wouldn’t exceed 200,000 per year.

“With the agreement between business and labor, every major policy issue has been resolved on the gang of eight,” Schumer said Sunday on NBC. “Now everyone, we’ve all agreed that we’re not going to come to a final agreement until we see draft legislative language and we agree on that.”

The other senators in the group are Democrats Richard Durbin of Illinois, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado and Republicans Jeff Flake and John McCain, both of Arizona.

Lesley Clark contributed to this article.

Read more articles by Franco Ordonez



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals