Previous
-
Let's take stock of the appallingly low number of perfect Final Four picks and look back at how other underdogs have done in the national semifinals. But first, a statistical basis for declaring that this is indeed the most unpredictable NCAA tournament in recent memory:
Text by Noah Trister/AP -
WILDEST. TOURNAMENT. EVER.
We've reached that point, according to a formula devised by Pete Tiernan over at BracketScience.com. Tiernan's formula - he calls it the "Madometer" - measures the unpredictability of each NCAA tournament since the field expanded to 64 teams. On a scale of 0 to 100 - with 0 meaning the higher seed wins every game and 100 meaning the opposite - the 2013 tournament checks in at 21.8 so far. Tiernan says even if top overall seed Louisville wins it all, this year's tournament will break the previous Madometer record of 19.8, set in 2011. (That, you may recall, was the year Virginia Commonwealth (pictured) and Butler made the Final Four, and a nine-loss Connecticut team won the title.) -
AND ON THAT NOTE ...
Forget filling out a perfect bracket. Even predicting the whole Final Four was almost impossible this year. ESPN reports that 47 percect out of 8.15 million brackets in its Tournament Challenge game made the right picks. That works out to about 1 in 173,000 brackets. -
HAPPY ANNIVERSARY
We've reached the point in the tournament where we can acknowledge the anniversary of title games past. So congrats to Georgetown (1984), UNLV (1990), Duke (2001), Florida (2007) and Kentucky (2012), who all won national championships on April 2. UNLV's title came in a 103-73 rout of Duke, and none of the other title games on April 2 were decided by fewer than eight points. The most memorable April 2 game may have been a semifinal between Houston and Louisville in 1983. The Cougars, a.k.a. Phi Slamma Jamma, beat the Cardinals 94-81 in what looked like it might be a de facto national title game - but N.C. State stunned Houston in the final, leading to those lasting images of beloved Wolfpack coach Jim Valvano desperately searching for someone to hug. -
CONFERENCE SUPREMACY UPDATE
We'll provide the numbers. Now let the spin begin. The Big Ten leads all conferences with 13 wins so far in the NCAA tournament. The Big East is second with 11. So is it better to have four teams in the round of 16 but only one in the Final Four like the Big Ten - or would you rather be the Big East, with two teams (Syracuse pictured) in the Final Four but five one-and-dones? Or maybe the real winner is the Missouri Valley conference, which sent only two teams but still has a shot at an improbable national championship. -
STAT OF THE DAY
The folks at STATS offer the following: Wichita State is just the fifth team seeded ninth or lower - seeding began in 1979 - to reach the Final Four. While those low seeds are 0-4 in national semifinals, No. 8 seeds have fared quite a bit better, with a combined record of 3-2. The three eighth-seeded teams, who share the distinction as the lowest seeds to reach the title game, were UCLA in 1980, Villanova in 1985 and Butler two years ago. Villanova is the one team from that group to win the national championship, pulling off its upset of Georgetown 28 years ago on April Fool's Day. Can Wichita State supplant that group as the lowest-seeded team to win the tournament? Well, the only other No. 9 seed to reach the Final Four was Penn in 1979, and the Quakers lost to Michigan State 101-67. Penn still shares the Final Four record for largest margin of defeat with Oregon State, which lost to Cincinnati 80-46 in 1963. -
QUOTE OF THE DAY
"I said to him, 'You want me to bring it back or stay with you?' He said, 'It's staying with me.' I said, 'All right, just make sure you don't lose it."' - Louisville coach Rick Pitino, discussing injured guard Kevin Ware's desire to keep the team's regional championship trophy. Pitino visited Ware again Monday, the day after he broke his leg in a gruesome injury against Duke.
See a photo gallery of Ware's injury and reaction.
Watch a video report on Ware's condition, road to recovery.
What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com
Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)
Here are some rules of the road:
• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.
• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.
• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.
You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.
If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.
About Comments
Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.