0 comments | Print

Inside medicine : The danger of 'inattentional blindness'

Published: Thursday, Apr. 4, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 3D

Jane's worsening migraine headaches over several months brought her to the doctor's office.

The moment the medical student walked into the examination room, she noticed Jane had a large, black and brown irregular spot the size of a half-dollar on her arm just above the wrist. The student was quick to consider the skin cancer.

Why hadn't she come in sooner, wondered the student, particularly given the large and rapidly expanding size of the mole? The student guessed Jane must have looked at the mole a dozen times every day.

One explanation for Jane's lack of action to seek advice about the spot might be denial – a powerful and often dangerous method of dealing with fear.

Another explanation might be what has been called "inattentional blindness" – we don't see things that we are not expecting.

A recent example of inattentional blindness involved a study of 24 expert radiologists – physician experts trained at reading imaging studies such as X-rays, CT scans, MRIs.

Each radiologist was asked to look at five lung CT scans, each of which had multiple areas of lung cancer. The radiologists were told to use a mouse and click on every area of the CT scan where cancer was visible.

Researchers modified the fifth CT and inserted a picture into the CT scan of what they thought was a very obvious gorilla that was nearly 50 times larger than any of the cancer nodules.

After they finished reading the CT scans, the radiologists were asked if they noticed anything different about the fifth X-ray. If they responded no, they were then asked point-blank: "Did you see a gorilla?"

Twenty of the 24 did not see the gorilla when reading the CTs. Of course, they all saw the gorilla immediately when ask to look for it a second time.

These were not bad radiologists, but 83 percent of them missed a large abnormality on the CT scan. The study shows that when we are paying attention to one thing we often fail to notice other very obvious things happening at the same time.

In this case the radiologists were looking for lung cancer so they ignored everything else – even a dancing gorilla that any 5-year-old would easily spot.

But this is more than just interesting social science. It can have significant implications as it did for Jane, who ended up with serious skin cancer.

Most of us can think of examples in our own everyday lives when we fail to see the obvious because our attention is focused on details. This is particularly true with a failure to notice other people's emotions and well-being. It may be wise to force ourselves to regularly take a step back and consider the big picture and those we touch.

The goal would be to make sure we aren't missing anything important before we return again to focus on details that seem so important to us at the time.

Michael Wilkes, M.D., is a professor of medicine at the University of California, Davis. Identifying characteristics of patients mentioned in his column are changed to protect their confidentiality. Reach him at drwilkes@sacbee.com.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals