Jon Ortiz

0 comments | Print

The State Worker: Union pushes bill to get CalPERS' mailing list

Published: Thursday, Apr. 4, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Thursday, Apr. 4, 2013 - 2:29 pm

With 1.6 million members, CalPERS has a huge mailing list that employee organizations have lusted after for years.

Now a measure by freshman Assemblywoman Shirley Weber would give groups that represent retirees some access.

Assembly Bill 785 forbids them from using the CalPERS mailing information to send out political mailers, but recruiting brochures, benefit pamphlets and the like are in bounds.

Materials that pass muster would go to a direct-mail firm picked by CalPERS and the member organization.

The contracted company would use the list to address the mailers. It would then destroy the information to keep it from misuse.

The retiree associations would have to pay "any and all reasonable expenses of the mailing," according to Weber's bill, and wouldn't have direct access to the mailing information itself. The bill doesn't require the groups to pay for the data.

Similar lists purchased from companies would cost "thousands, if not tens of thousands, of dollars," said Sacramento State marketing expert Dennis Tootelian, "and that's for each time you'd use it."

Those private mailing lists often contain errors, he said, whereas CalPERS' data – the foundation for distributing pension checks and important notices to members – is highly accurate.

And sortable. Income, gender, age – CalPERS has all that member information much more.

"Whew," Tootelian said Wednesday after thinking about it. "That's an A+ mailing list at zero cost."

The employee groups might even parlay the deal to make a few bucks.

Say the XYZ Retirees' Association fires off a recruiting mailer that highlights cruise discounts or preferred insurance rates for its members. It could do that in exchange for a fee from the cruise line and the insurance company.

"What a great business deal," Tootelian said. "The unions make the money and CalPERS gets nothing."

Members on the receiving end of the mail probably wouldn't even realize the CalPERS connection.

The bill says says the fund "shall not be required to notify an annuitant whose data is released to a mail processing center."

The State Worker called and emailed Weber's office for an interview about the measure, which is sponsored by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. In an email, Weber's staff said she was unavailable to answer questions.

Her office emailed a comment attributed to the San Diego Democrat: "Freedom of Assembly is a core American value. This bill will make it easier for retirees to come together and improve retirement securities for all middle-class families."

Tootelian, who is a CalPERS member, said he's unhappy that his pension fund might give away his personal information.

"I didn't sign up to make my personal information available to whatever these people might be hawking," he said. "I think it's a violation of privacy."

Call The Bee's Jon Ortiz, (916) 321-1043. Follow him on Twitter @thestateworker and read his blog, The State Worker.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals