Photos Loading
previous next
  • California Department of Transportation

    This structure was built on Brian Liebich's property. A federal report said Liebich stole materials for a gate on the property. The dwelling appears to have been built, in part, with stolen materials.

  • California Department of Transportation

    Duane Wiles, above, admitted he had moved "misappropriated" state and federal materials to the property near Susanville owned by Brian Liebich, then his supervisor at Caltrans, according to a federal investigative report.

0 comments | Print

Firing of Caltrans testing supervisor upheld

Published: Friday, Apr. 5, 2013 - 8:25 am
Last Modified: Friday, Apr. 5, 2013 - 11:40 pm

The firing of a former engineering supervisor for the California Department of Transportation, whose unit was involved in falsification of test data for foundations of state bridges, was upheld Thursday by the State Personnel Board.

Brian Liebich, who once headed the Caltrans Foundation Testing Branch, had appealed his firing, which took place in November 2011 following a Bee investigation of malfeasance and fraud within his unit. Liebich was fired for taking building materials from a state storage area and using them for structures on his personal property in Susanville, and for fraudulently approving payments to employees in his unit who helped him move the materials.

One of those employees, Duane Wiles, admitted to falsifying data. Wiles also was fired, but later was rehired by Caltrans and allowed to retire with full benefits.

The ruling by Barbara E. Allen-Brecher, an administrative law judge, called Liebich's testimony in his own defense "evasive and inconsistent," and less credible than other Caltrans witnesses.

The judge dismissed other charges, including that Liebich acted "with inefficiency and willful disobedience," and that he improperly approved certain overtime payments.

Liebich could not be reached for comment. His attorney, Steve Simas, said grounds for the rejection of some charges apparently were not applied uniformly by the judge, which he called "concerning." Simas said his firm would "weigh our options with our client" after a complete review of the ruling.

"(Liebich) was vested with great autonomy and authority in his position. He used that autonomy and authority for his personal gain (and) accepts little, if any, responsibility for his misconduct," Allen-Brecher wrote, suggesting "a very high likelihood of recurrence should he be reinstated."

Liebich could request a rehearing before the board or petition for a review in Superior Court.

Call The Bee's Charles Piller, (916) 321-1113. Follow him on Twitter @cpiller.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Charles Piller



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals