0 comments | Print

Airport control tower closures put on hold; Sacramento officials study options

Published: Saturday, Apr. 6, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 6B

Sacramento County airport officials said Friday they are looking into ways they can pay to keep the Sacramento Executive Airport traffic control tower open if the federal government follows through on a plan to cut tower financing.

"Like other airports, we are looking into the possibility of funding the tower at Executive Airport," airports spokeswoman Laurie Slothower said in an emailed statement. "However, we need to investigate the best way to do this, what hours would be optimum for staffing, and other logistical issues."

As a general aviation facility, Executive Airport serves mainly private aircraft owners. Its tower is on a list of 149 sites planned for closure by the Federal Aviation Administration as part of federal budget cutbacks.

The agency initially announced it would begin some closures Sunday.

In an announcement Friday, however, the FAA said it is postponing closures until June 15 to give the federal government more time to deal with legal challenges to the action.

Local airport officials say they are monitoring the issue.

"The fact that the FAA has postponed tower closures shows how this situation continues to evolve," Slothower said. "We still do not know the outcome."

Sacramento Executive on Freeport Boulevard handles thousands of flights annually, and the tower already sometimes goes unmanned while planes are using the airport. Local airport officials have said they are disappointed by the federal government's closure plans, but they point out that McClellan, Rancho Murieta and Lincoln airports already operate without air traffic control towers.

FAA officials have said they are contemplating limiting hours at FAA towers at larger airports, including possibly shutting down the Sacramento International tower after midnight. The agency has not, however, completed any large airport tower closure plans. Local airport officials said they have not heard anything definitive regarding a tower closure at Sacramento International.

The Associated Press reports about 50 airport authorities and other stakeholders have indicated they want to fund the operations of the towers themselves rather than see them shut down. FAA officials said more time will be needed to work out those plans.

The U.S. Contract Tower Association, which represents the companies that operate contract towers such as the one at Executive Airport, has challenged the closures in federal court, the AP reported.

"The administration has decided to make tower closures the poster child of sequestration" (automatic spending cuts), said the group's director, J. Spencer Dickerson. "We believe there are other ways they could have skinned this cat."

Federal officials have insisted that the closures wouldn't affect safety. And there is evidence that with improving safety, some of the closures would make economic sense.

According to the AP, the FAA has been using 30-year-old data on aircraft collisions to justify the cost of operating many of the control towers, even though accident rates have improved significantly over that time.

Call The Bee's Tony Bizjak, (916) 321-1059.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Tony Bizjak



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals