Editorial: Steinberg's bill would infringe on local control

Published: Tuesday, Jun. 25, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 8A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Jun. 25, 2013 - 8:15 am

Senate Bill 7, authored by Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and sponsored by his union allies, challenges the independence of charter cities in ways that are heavy-handed and unfair.

The bill would deny state construction funding – including state bond money, loans or grants – to any city whose voters have approved charter provisions that exempt contractors from paying prevailing wages for locally funded projects.

The bill seeks to blunt the impact of a California Supreme Court decision last year in State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. City of Vista et al. In that case, the justices ruled 5-2 that when a charter city is using purely local funds to pay for municipal projects such as a firehouse, bike trail or street repairs, the city is not bound by the state's prevailing wage laws.

Of California's 120 charter cities, 51 have approved charter provisions that exempt them either partially or completely from state prevailing wage requirements when they use their own money for city construction projects.

Under the law, those 51 cities cannot avoid usually higher union wage rates if they use any state funds to build their public works. And, that's fair.

It's expected that strings will be attached to state funding. The state gets to make the rules when it's paying the bills.

But the legislation by Steinberg, who has floated the idea that he might run for Sacramento mayor when his Senate term expires, seeks to punish charter cities such as Sacramento for exercising their right to spend their own money in ways they decide is best, in ways that are most cost efficient to those cities and their residents.

In the case of Vista, city voters approved a half-cent sales tax increase in 2006 to construct municipal projects, including two firehouses, a civic center and an amphitheater. By electing to become a charter city and thus exempt from prevailing wage laws, voters in Vista were told that the city could save millions of dollars in construction costs for these projects.

Steinberg's SB 7 would punish them for that vote. The bill would deny Vista, or any other city whose voters exercised their constitutional right to use local funds in ways they see fit, their fair share of proceeds from state water, park or transportation bonds that their residents pay for with their taxes. That's bullying and an outrageous misuse of legislative authority.

While the independence of charter cities is under attack specifically in this bill, the prevailing wage rate issue touches all jurisdictions. The Department of Industrial Relations sets prevailing wage rates based on the most frequently occurring rate in a region.

That methodology, unique to California, means that the prevailing rate will be the union rate and almost always the highest rate paid. But union rates don't reflect the reality of most local labor markets. They can inflate construction costs wildly, particularly in the economically depressed Central Valley, boosting the cost of a project from 15 to 30 percent.

Hard-pressed cities with limited budgets often can't afford to fix streets, upgrade schools or improve water systems.

It's unlikely that labor-friendly Democratic legislators will defeat Steinberg's union-backed bill. If SB 7 reached Gov. Jerry Brown's desk, the governor, who has championed local control, should veto it. Beyond that, he should do something about how his Department of Industrial Relations calculates prevailing wage rates.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by the Editorial Board

Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Sacramento Bee Jobs »
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads


Price Range:
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older