Autumn Cruz / acruz@sacbee.com

Child Protective Services Director Laura Coulthard, speaking to members of the CPS Citizens Academy in April, told The Bee on Friday that the agency has cooperated with a Sacramento County grand jury's investigation. The grand jury claims CPS has resisted the panel's probe.

Our Region - Sacramento County News
Comments (0) | | Print

Grand jury warns CPS to cooperate in probe

Published: Saturday, Oct. 4, 2008 - 12:02 am | Page 1A
Last Modified: Saturday, Oct. 4, 2008 - 9:14 pm

Complaining that its investigation of Child Protective Services is being stonewalled, the Sacramento County grand jury has warned all CPS employees and its leaders that they must cooperate with the panel's probe.

In a strongly worded two-page letter issued to all CPS workers this week, the grand jury said it has "been met with staff resistance and staff improperly refusing to answer general program questions."

"Any further refusals to answer general program questions or the citing of confidentiality statutes when none apply will be considered a direct attempt to interfere with the Grand Jury's investigations," said the letter from grand jury foreman Donald Prange Sr.

Grand jury proceedings are confidential. A copy of the letter, obtained by The Bee, indicates that Prange sent the warning Wednesday to Penelope Clarke, the county administrator who oversees CPS and its parent agency, the Department of Health and Human Services. It was forwarded to all CPS employees, instructing them to cooperate with the probe, sources said.

CPS Director Laura Coulthard told The Bee on Friday via e-mail, "Since the beginning, Sacramento County and CPS have fully cooperated with the Grand Jury in its investigation and will continue to."

The investigation was sparked by stories in The Bee about a string of child deaths and about the agency's altering of documents in one case.

Prange indicated in the letter that CPS staff members have resisted answering the panel's questions and have improperly cited the confidentiality statutes in doing so.

"So that the Grand Jury can continue these investigations without further delay, please direct DHHS management and staff to fully cooperate with our investigations," he wrote.

Prange said that one of the areas being examined includes "policies regarding altering documents," and he warned CPS administrators that they cannot retaliate against employees who cooperate with the investigation.

"There should be no intimidation/harassment of interviewees by management and no questioning regarding testimony taken by the Grand Jury," the letter said, in a section typed in boldface.

The grand jury's letter appears in part to be a response to a memo that Coulthard issued to her staff on Sept. 25.

That memo, obtained by The Bee, had the subject line "DISCLOSURES TO THE GRAND JURY." It warned CPS staffers against violating confidentiality laws and instructed workers to inform an agency manager if they were contacted by the grand jury.

Coulthard also told workers that the law requires a court order before individual case information can be released and that "the Grand Jury and its individual members are considered part of the general public and therefore they too need a court order."

Responding to The Bee's questions about her memo, Coulthard wrote Friday:

"There was some initial confusion when employees began receiving unexpected phone calls and questions from a person claiming to be a Grand Jury member. ...(Y)ou want some way of confirming that the person at the other end of the phone is in fact who they say they are. CPS staff is trained and expected to closely guard confidential case information in order to protect children and families."

The letter the grand jury sent to CPS notes that the panel is not seeking individual case information, yet has met with resistance from staffers who appear to be "consistently confused and mistaken about when it is proper to cite these confidentiality statutes."

It is not the first time CPS has been accused of impeding a grand jury investigation. The 1998-99 grand jury report said the panel "was hindered by the slow responses and recalcitrance of CPS administrators."

Last year's grand jury registered similar concerns about its probe of the Sacramento Public Library system, which is overseen by a 14-person board of elected officials, including the five members of the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors.

That panel issued a letter in June noting that it "met not only indifference, but also active resistance and determined efforts to thwart the investigation."

The county grand jury consists of 19 volunteer citizens with broad subpoena power in their secret investigations of public agencies or officials. Grand jury findings can result in criminal charges, recommendations for new laws or reports identifying problems.


Call The Bee's Marjie Lundstrom, (916) 321-1055.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older