Opinion - Editorials
Comments (0) | | Print

More ballot-box budgeting for education will only make a bad problem worse

Published: Sunday, Mar. 29, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 6E

'NO' ON PROPOSITION 1B

At first glance, Proposition 1B seems attractive because it promises more money for schools in future years. But voters should give this proposition a hard look. It makes spending commitments that could be a burden on the state as soon as 2011 while doing nothing to end the volatility of education expenditures.

Here are the politics: To pass a budget deal, the governor and lawmakers needed to reduce school spending along with that of other state programs. To make a tax increase palatable to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and a few other Republicans, Democrats reluctantly agreed to place a spending-limitation measure, Proposition 1A, on the ballot.

The trouble was, both of these actions – reduced school spending and a future spending limitation – drew the wrath of the California Teachers Association, one of the Capitol's power players. So to prevent the CTA from either upending the budget deal or opposing Proposition 1A, the governor and legislative leaders cooked up a sweetener – Proposition 1B.

In essence, this measure would settle a long-standing legal dispute over how much the state owes public education under Proposition 98, a convoluted school-spending measure voters passed in 1988. Proposition 1B pegs the owed amount at $9.3 billion and directs annual installments on this amount to begin in 2011. That would generate payments that, according to the Legislative Analyst's Office, would be billions of dollars higher than current law allows.

We support public education, but that support has to be weighed against the harm caused by ballot-box budgeting. Measures such as Proposition 98 have compounded California's fiscal woes while doing little to assure stable funding for schools. Proposition 1B is another chapter in this regrettable history, and within just two years it could create spending obligations the state couldn't afford.

If voters were to reject this measure, the CTA would likely go to the courts to achieve what it couldn't through the ballot box. Let it rip. While politicians may need to cut deals to get budgets passed, voters don't need to rubber-stamp those deals. This one is a bad one for California and voters should say "No" to it.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover