Capitol and California - State Budget
Comments (0) | | Print

Dan Walters: GOP lawmakers hide behind anti-tax facade

Published: Friday, Sep. 26, 2008 - 12:00 am | Page 3A

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive."

– Sir Walter Scott

The state budget that the Legislature stapled together last week was a particularly tangled and deceptive bit of work, and one of its more noxious aspects was a ruse to preserve the utter fiction that Republicans reject new taxes.

As a budget deficit loomed last year, all Republican legislators but one signed a no-new-taxes pledge pushed by anti-tax activist Grover Norquist and refused, therefore, to vote for income taxes that Democrats wanted or temporary sales taxes Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger sought.

Eventually, legislative leaders crafted a bipartisan deal that eschewed direct new taxes and included, instead, a sly combination of taxes and borrowing. Taxpayers would be required to "accelerate" – increase – payments to the state next year through increased withholding, thereby providing a one-time, multibillion-dollar infusion of cash that many taxpayers could claim later as refunds.

Republicans helped pass a budget based on the "acceleration" scheme that would shift nearly $4 billion from taxpayers to the state. But they also wanted to preserve their anti-tax purity – something akin to technical virginity – and refused to vote for the actual tax bill.

The budget and other budget-related bills required two-thirds margins, and thus at least a few Republican votes, but the tax acceleration was placed in a special session bill that could be enacted with only a simple majority measure – a maneuver as sneaky and hypocritical as it sounds – and it passed without Republican votes. Most Republicans, in fact, voted against it (see, Grover, we kept the pledge), even though they embraced a budget financed with its revenues.

That shabby deception backfired a bit, however, when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared he'd veto the budget unless lawmakers agreed to changes, including dumping personal income tax acceleration.

Overriding a veto of that sneaky tax bill would have required at least a few Republicans to go on record as forcing Californians to cough up billions of dollars next year, which they weren't willing to do, even as they endorsed overriding a budget veto.

"We do not subscribe nor do we support the idea of doing a withholding," Assembly Republican leader Mike Villines told a Fresno radio station. "I agree it's a total gimmick and would never vote for it. Not one Republican voted for that, nor would one Republican vote for that. … It sends the wrong message to taxpayers that we're going to use your money up front and give it to you later. That's ridiculous."

The personal income tax provisions were removed from the bill, and an equally ridiculous, stopgap substitute involving corporate taxes was adopted to complete the budget. But that didn't change the fact that Republicans were willing, even eager, to accept a budget financed with tax revenues they said they opposed.

It's the very embodiment of political hypocrisy.


Call The Bee's Dan Walters, (916) 321-1195. Back columns, www.sacbee.com/walters.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older