Slideshow Loading
previous next
  • New York Times file, 2006

    CalPERS is a major investor in Stuyvesant Town, one of two adjoining apartment complexes near the East River in Manhattan. The $5.4 billion purchase, made in 2006, is now reportedly worth an estimated $2.1 billion, and the investment is about to go bust, according to the Wall Street Journal. The investment fell flat when the economy slowed.

  • CalPERS is a major investor in Peter Cooper Village, one of two adjoining apartment complexes near the East River in Manhattan. The $5.4 billion purchase, made in 2006, is now reportedly worth an estimated $2.1 billion, and the investment is about to go bust, according to the Wall Street Journal. The investment fell flat when the economy slowed.

Business
Comments (0) | | Print

CalPERS could lose $500 million on N.Y. real estate deal

Published: Thursday, Oct. 15, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 8B

CalPERS is in danger of losing $500 million on a New York real estate deal, the latest in a series of major investment setbacks.

The deal was costly to California's other big public pension fund, too. CalSTRS said it has already written off its $100 million investment.

The two funds were among the major investors in a group that purchased a Manhattan apartment complex called Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town for $5.4 billion in 2006.

The investment is about to go bust. The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that the complex, owned by a partnership led by Tishman Speyer Properties and BlackRock Inc., might soon go into default. Quoting anonymous sources, the paper said the partnership could run out of cash in two months. It also said the property's value has sunk to an estimated $2.1 billion.

Investors were banking on Tishman Speyer's ability to raise rents, even though most of the units are subject to New York rent controls. But the investment fell flat when the economy slowed.

Other big investors included the Government of Singapore Investment Corp. and the Church of England, according to the newspaper.

Clark McKinley, a spokesman for the California Public Employees' Retirement System, confirmed that the fund put $500 million into the project in November 2006.

He declined to say whether CalPERS has written off any of the investment but added that it has declined to increase its investment.

"We're not putting any more money in (the project) at this time," he said.

The California State Teachers' Retirement System wrote off its investment in the fiscal year that ended June 30, said spokeswoman Sherry Reser.

The two funds lost a combined $100 billion during the latest fiscal year. Much of the loss was in stocks and other financial instruments, but both funds have suffered hits to their real estate portfolios as well.

CalSTRS' real estate holdings fell 43 percent during the year. Meanwhile, CalPERS lost nearly $1 billion on one real estate deal alone, a massive housing investment known as LandSource, which went into bankruptcy reorganization.


Call The Bee's Dale Kasler, (916) 321-1066. Read his blog on the economy, Home Front, at www.sacbee.com/blogs.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover