Slideshow Loading
previous next
  • JAY REITER / McClatchy Tribune

    Married couple Michele Frost, center, and Mary Helen Walker, with their 3-year-old daughter, Shea, say they've been treated warmly and without bias in Massachusetts.

  • JAY REITER / McClatchy Tribune

    When Michele Frost, left, and Mary Helen Walker of Quincy, Mass., enrolled their 3-year-old daughter, Shea, in preschool, it required an application form change to reflect their marital status. The couple reported that school officials simply substituted "Parent 1" and "Parent 2" in place of mother and father without making a big deal. Getting a marriage certificate from the city proved to be a similar, nonjudgmental experience. "We've been greeted so warmly," says Frost.

Capitol and California
Comments (0) | | Print

Gay marriage: Bitter battle over, couples find acceptance

Published: Sunday, Aug. 10, 2008 - 12:00 am | Page 16A

BOSTON – When Michele Frost and Mary Helen Walker enrolled their 3-year-old daughter Shea in preschool, it required a change in the school application form. But it was no big deal: Officials simply substituted the words "mother" and "father" with "Parent 1" and "Parent 2."

And when they got their marriage license, city employees behind the counter were more interested in the child than in questioning the two lesbians about their relationship.

"We have been greeted so warmly," said Frost, 42, who three years ago moved from Chicago to Quincy, Mass., just south of Boston. "We've just had a great experience."

Nearly five years after the state's Supreme Court ruled that a ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional, the vitriolic battle that brought international attention and apocalyptic fears to Massachusetts is all but dead. Since the first marriages on May 17, 2004, more than 11,000 couples have wed. Polls have shown consistent public support for gay couples.

And with overwhelming support for gay marriage in the state Legislature – the last effort to put a constitutional ban on the ballot failed by a vote of 151 to 45 – the opposition has, for the most part, packed its bags and gone home.

"The biggest surprise about the whole thing is that there really has been no surprise," said Republican state Rep. Paul Loscocco. "It's been fairly much a nonevent."

California vote seen as pivotal

While gay marriage is firmly entrenched in Massachusetts, gay activists in the Bay State say the future of the movement nationally could well depend on what happens in California.

In May, the California Supreme Court made the state the second to legalize gay marriage, but voters will get the final say on Nov. 4 when they decide whether to back Proposition 8 to ban same-sex marriage in the state constitution.

A Field Poll released last month showed that 51 percent of likely voters would oppose the ballot initiative, while 42 percent would support it.

"As goes California, so goes the rest of country," said Joyce Kauffman, a lawyer in Cambridge who's active in promoting gay and lesbian issues.

As Californians prepare to vote, Loscocco is advising them to keep an open mind. He certainly did. When the Massachusetts court made its decision in November 2003, Loscocco railed against it as an act of judicial tyranny.

Now he calls gay marriage an opportunity "for people to come out of the shadows," a bold experiment that's consistent with America's great laboratory of ideas. And sitting next to a framed photograph of Ronald Reagan in his state office, he suggests that even the Gipper might back gay marriage today.

"He was certainly a hero of mine and I think that he was always a fair and open-minded person," said Loscocco, adding that his change of heart is consistent with a change in attitudes among his constituents.

Five years ago, he said, 70 percent of those who weighed in on gay marriage opposed it, while now 70 percent support it. And among younger voters in his district, support is closer to 90 percent, he said.

Kauffman said the legalization of gay marriage in Massachusetts and California represents "an amazing advance in the law" and signals "a sea change of attitudes toward the gay community."

And she predicted that more states will follow suit: "I am confident that at some point in the not too distant future, gay marriage will become the reality across the country."

Not only has much of the controversy faded in Massachusetts, but gay marriage is now regarded as a big tourist draw.

State clears way for wedding business

And the state is making it clear it wants to compete with California for wedding business.

Gay activist Marc Solomon, whose sunny office overlooks the gold-domed statehouse on tony Beacon Hill, said it was a loud wake-up call for Massachusetts when California legalized gay marriage. With California going further than Massachusetts, allowing out-of-state couples to legally marry in the state, Solomon and his backers wanted to repeal a 1913 law that banned such marriages.


Call Rob Hotakainen, McClatchy Washington Bureau, (202) 383-0009.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older