Capitol and California
Comments (0) | | Print

Schwarzenegger sues California controller over pay cuts

Published: Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2008 - 12:00 am | Page 4A

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration sued Democratic state Controller John Chiang on Monday in an effort to cut pay for about 180,000 state employees by the end of August, moving the salary battle from the political arena to the courtroom.

Chiang vowed to defy the Republican governor's pay instructions asking that 150,000 state employees receive the federal minimum wage of $6.55 per hour and 30,000 managers and supervisors receive a salary equal to $11.38 per hour until a state budget is enacted.

Lawmakers remained at odds Monday over how to resolve a $15.2 billion shortfall. Schwarzenegger continues to seek support for a temporary sales tax increase in exchange for lasting improvements in the budget process.

Schwarzenegger believes a 2003 California Supreme Court ruling, White v. Davis, mandates that salary reductions take place, with workers receiving their back pay only when the budget is signed. The governor also said the move is necessary so the state can conserve enough cash to pay its bills in September.

The governor's Department of Personnel Administration alleged Monday that Chiang, by paying full salaries, would violate parts of the state constitution and Government Code that prevent the controller from issuing pay without a budget in place.

"In the absence of a current budget, or other available appropriation, the Office of the State Controller is prohibited by state law from paying state employees their salaries," the suit argues.

Chiang disputes the governor's legal interpretation. He also has said it would take a minimum of six months to reduce pay to the federal minimum wage because of an outdated computer system and numerous individual deductions for each employee.

"Rather than focus on building consensus for a budget that addresses California's long-term fiscal problems, the governor seems adamant on picking a fight over whether state employees are entitled to the wages they have worked for and earned," Chiang said in a statement. "I am confident the court will share my concerns that it will be infeasible for the existing payroll system to reduce the wages of more than 180,000 public servants down to the federal minimum wage in such a short time."

The controller's payroll chief, Don Scheppmann, sent a three-page memo Monday to Schwarzenegger's Department of Personnel Administration asking for more time to analyze the pay cut.

Scheppmann raised several new questions in his letter to DPA, including whether the governor's legal interpretation implies that 55,000 California State University employees also should have their pay reduced to the federal minimum wage. Schwarzenegger's original order exempted the CSU system, but the Controller's Office believes it would be subject to the pay reduction under the governor's plan.

The governor had asked Chiang to comply by Monday. The controller faces an Aug. 21 deadline to begin processing final payroll for the month.

"We can't afford to wait any longer for the State Controller's Office to comply with the 2003 court ruling," said DPA spokeswoman Lynelle Jolley.

The governor has exempted about 50,000 employees from the order because they serve health and safety functions or they are in revenue-producing positions. He believes the 2003 decision allows those employees to receive full pay if they qualify for overtime.

Schwarzenegger also met resistance Monday from a bipartisan group of 17 state senators who demanded that he rescind 1,645 layoffs from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and salary cuts for the department's 66,000 permanent employees, calling it a "glaring, hazardous threat to public safety."

In a letter, they threatened to hold public hearings Wednesday if he does not reverse his corrections moves. They questioned why he exempted other departments for public safety reasons, but not CDCR. Among the signatories were Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, and Senate Republican Leader Dave Cogdill, R-Modesto.

"We believe your order fails to ensure the safety at these prisons, the officers and staff, the 170,000 inmates incarcerated, and anyone who lives within a 50 mile radius," they wrote. "In sum, you have unnecessarily and unarguably placed law abiding, tax paying citizens in proximate physical danger."

The governor's Cabinet secretary, Dan Dunmoyer, said last week that corrections Secretary Matthew Cate would exempt individual units on a case-by-case basis because the department is too large to give a blanket exemption.

"We have and will continue to review exemption requests for public safety and we are also reviewing exemption requests in corrections," said Schwarzenegger press secretary Aaron McLear.


Call Kevin Yamamura, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 326-5548.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older