Capitol and California
Comments (0) | | Print

Slumping California Lottery searches for a winning hand

Published: Sunday, Aug. 17, 2008 - 12:00 am | Page 12A

On Oct. 3, 1985, you could have stood in a long line outside a liquor store a few blocks from the Capitol for a chance to buy a small piece of cardboard and win a big sum of money.

Today, you can do the same thing – only with no line.

That, in 50 words, is the story of the California Lottery – a 23-year-old anachronism that is among the worst performing of the country's 42 state lotteries.

While many other states' lotteries set sales records in the fiscal year that ended June 30, California lottery officials announced that revenues for the Golden State's games would be $275 million lower than the previous year.

The slump comes at an inauspicious time for California. Desperate for new revenue sources that aren't direct tax increases, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has called for leveraging future lottery revenues into current cash to help plug the state's gaping budget hole.

After first suggesting the lottery could be leased to a private operator, the governor proposed selling bonds that would be secured by revenues from the games, which would be upgraded and improved to produce roughly twice as much revenue as they currently do.

"It's an asset that is underperforming," Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger observed in mid-May when announcing his bond sales proposal. " … Our lottery does not perform at 100 percent … . We're making $3 billion on our lottery. We could make $6 (billion) or $7 billion on our lottery. Other states make that amount of money."

That California's lottery is, relatively speaking, a weak sister among U.S. lotteries, is undeniable. Compared to the other nine most populous states, in fact, California's lottery is dead last in per capita sales, per capita advertising, retailer representation and prize payout.

But to make the kind of money Schwarzenegger is talking about, lottery officials and industry experts say, would require an overhaul of an operation that voters put into place back when portable phones weighed 2 pounds.

"The trouble is the California Lottery has never been run as if it's a retail business, and as a result, it has not done well at all," said Michael Jones, former director of the Illinois lottery and current director of Independent Lottery Research, a Chicago-based lottery industry consulting company. "It has never lived up to its potential."

That potential seemed limitless when the lottery debuted, 11 months after voters approved Prop. 37 by 58 to 42 percent. Under the initiative, at least half the money wagered would be returned in prizes; at least 34 percent would go to schools, and no more than 16 percent for running the games.

More than 80 million scratch-off tickets – a U.S. record – were sold in the first week. Gross revenues for the first year topped $1.7 billion.

But a combination of factors have combined to slow the lottery's meteoric start to a glacial trudge.

For one thing, the lottery has been hampered by what might charitably be called inconsistent leadership, with 19 executive directors in 23 years.

Voters compounded the lottery's problems in 1998 and 2000, when they gave their blessing to initiatives that granted California Indian tribes exclusivity in operating slot machines within the state's borders.

Since then, the tribes have jealously guarded their monopoly. After some tribal interests expressed concern recently that the Schwarzenegger administration was thinking of asking voters to approve slot-like video lottery terminals, or VLTs, administration officials firmly denied that was the governor's intention.

"We will do nothing that will infringe upon the compacts," said Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron McLear.

The administration also says that because of tribal opposition, it won't seek voter approval of the reinstatement of a highly popular online Keno game that some other state lotteries operate.

In 1996, the state Supreme Court ruled Keno was unconstitutional because it was not a true lottery game.

Despite the prospect of a future without VLTs or Keno, the lottery's current director, Joan Borucki, says the lottery can achieve Schwarzenegger's lofty revenue goals, if voters agree to change the rules so that the lottery can:


Call Steve Wiegand, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 321-1076.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older