Before adjourning the 2008 regular session on Sunday, lawmakers approved 873 bills that have yet to be acted upon by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Were this a typical year, the bills would be piling up on his desk. But the governor has said he will not sign any measures until a budget is approved, and lawmakers - at least temporarily - are holding the bills back. Eventually, Schwarzenegger has until Sept. 30 to act on the bills. Here's a look at some of them:
ASSEMBLY BILLS
AB 583: Assemblywoman Loni Hancock, D-Berkeley
What it would do: Create a pilot project in which candidates for secretary of state in 2014 and 2018 could qualify for public campaign financing produced largely from a fee on lobbyists.
Analysis: Hancock has tried unsuccessfully for three years to pass a more wide-ranging public financing law. Opponents claim that public financing violates free-speech rights of potential donors.
AB 1107: Assemblyman Juan Arambula, D-Fresno
What it would do: Provide temporary financial relief for farmworkers who could work only part time because of the 2008 drought.
Analysis: Similar to bills signed into law in 1999 and 2007 in response to agricultural problems caused by freezes.
AB 1656: Assemblyman Dave Jones, D-Sacramento
What it would do: Restrict businesses from storing or releasing a customer's payment-related information unless necessary for business, legal or regulatory purposes.
Analysis: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a similar bill last year. AB 1656 attempts to ease the governor's concerns.
AB 1656: Assemblyman Ted Lieu, D-Torrance
What it would do: Hopes to prevent future housing mortgage crises by, among other things, banning negative amortization loans, capping prepayment penalties, and prohibiting brokers from making deceptive statements or steering borrowers to high-cost loans.
Analysis: Faces high-powered industry opposition, including the California Association of Mortgage Brokers, California Association of Realtors and California Mortgage Association.
AB 1879: Assemblyman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles
What it would do: Require Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt regulations for identifying and evaluating problem chemicals in consumer products.
Analysis: Would give state regulators broad authority to oversee - and potentially ban - hazardous chemicals in consumer products.
AB 1945: Assemblyman Hector De La Torre, D-South Gate
What it would do: Impose requirements and conditions on health insurance companies that seek to rescind existing policies.
Analysis: The bill is opposed by large HMOs. It received no Republican votes in the Senate, but was supported by 10 of 32 Assembly GOP members.
AB 2233: Assemblyman Bill Maze, R-Visalia
What it would do: Prohibit motorists from driving while holding a live animal in their arms or lap.
Analysis: Though proposed by a Republican, the bill was opposed by most GOP lawmakers and supported by most Democrats.
AB 2279: Assemblyman Mark Leno, D-San Francisco
What it would do: Ban employers from discriminating against medical marijuana users who neither use nor are impaired on the job.
Analysis: The bill was prompted by a California Supreme Court decision upholding the 2001 firing of a Carmichael resident, Gary Ross, by a telecommunications firm.
AB 2296: Assemblyman Gene Mullin, D-South San Francisco
What it would do: Make it a misdemeanor crime to post personal information of an animal researcher with the intent to incite violence.
Analysis: The measure stemmed from an attempted home invasion targeting a UC Santa Cruz faculty member who had used mice for breast cancer research.
AB 2386: Assemblyman Fabian Núñez, D-Los Angeles
What it would do: Provide farmworkers with an alternative to ballot-booth elections in deciding whether to be represented by a union.
Analysis: Sponsored by the United Farm Workers, the bill raises issues similar to those in a bill vetoed by Schwarzenegger last year.


About Comments
Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.