Capitol and California
Comments (0) | | Print

Cash-strapped California looks to its pension funds

Published: Tuesday, Oct. 7, 2008 - 12:00 am | Page 3A

With California's wallet emptying out faster than the cash is trickling in, state officials scrambling to pay the bills have set their sights on new lending sources: California's two biggest public pension funds.

Sen. Dean Florez, D-Shafter, has proposed that the California Public Employees' Retirement System purchase the state's looming debt. The money would keep California operating – including paying state employee payroll and funding schools – into next year.

Florez outlined the plan in a letter to state Treasurer Bill Lockyer on Friday. Lockyer spokesman Tom Dresslar on Monday said his boss will also float the idea to the California State Teachers' Retirement System. Lockyer sits on the boards of both funds.

"I just thought, 'Nobody is talking about CalPERS as a possible investor,' " Florez said Monday. "They might be able to get us a better deal than the banks, and we might be able to give them a better return on their investment than the stock market, especially right now."

Florez and Dresslar said that if the funds wouldn't purchase state notes, Lockyer could ask them to issue letters of credit to shore up investor confidence.

Institutional buyers usually bridge California's end-of-year operating expenses by purchasing revenue anticipation notes, or RANs. But with investors flocking to conservative investments, Lockyer may have tough finding buyers for the $7 billion in RANs that the state plans to offer for sale next week.

Normally, investors snap up state notes. But the sharp downturn in the economy and the stock market's wild ride have left investors frightened.

Schwarzenegger said last week that he'll seek a short-term $7 billion loan from the federal government if the RANs go unsold.

It's not clear whether CalPERS and CalSTRS will step into the breach, say experts. The financial turmoil has wiped out tens of billions of dollars in investments for both funds.

CalPERS, the nation's largest public pension fund with $211 billion in assets as of Friday, has lost about 11 percent of its value since the end of June. No. 2 CalSTRS' $158.7 billion in assets represents a 6 percent loss between June 30 and Aug. 31, the last date for which data are available.

Representatives for CalPERS and CalSTRS said that both funds would consider buying RANs.

"If we are approached, our investment staff would do their normal due diligence and make an objective evaluation of its merits," CalPERS spokeswoman Pat Macht said in an e-mail.

"We look forward to seeing the letter from the office of the state treasurer," Ricardo Duran of CalSTRS wrote in an e-mail. "Once it has been received, CalSTRS will do legal and investment analyses of the opportunity as part of its due diligence."

It's possible that the funds will take a pass, said Keith Brainard, research director for the National Association of State Retirement Administrators.

"If the state can't borrow money from the credit markets, why would CalPERS be interested?" Brainard said.


Call The Bee's Jon Ortiz, (916) 321-1043.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older