Slideshow Loading
previous next
  • BRIAN BAER / bbaer@sacbee.com

    Zoe Keithley of Sacramento joins a counterdemonstration against Proposition 8 at Riverside Wesleyan Church. On Thursday, adversaries will present oral arguments to the California Supreme Court.

  • BRIAN BAER / bbaer@sacbee.com

    Proposition 8 backer Richie Beanan of Los Angeles takes part in a rally Oct. 20 at Riverside Wesleyan Church in Sacramento. Polls initially gave foes a comfortable lead, but the measure won approval

  • Shannon Minter, a lead counsel in the state Supreme Court case that let same-sex couples wed, spent his first 35 years as a female.

  • Kenneth Starr, best know for the probe that led to Bill Clinton's impeachment, has long been an advocate for traditional marriage.

Capitol and California
Comments (0) | | Print

Dueling lawyers in California Prop. 8 case are a study in opposites

Published: Sunday, Mar. 1, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 1A

Kenneth Starr and Shannon Minter, lead attorneys in the California Supreme Court case that will decide the fate of same-sex marriage in the state, are as different as the competing sides they represent.

Starr, dean of Pepperdine University School of Law, is best known for leading the inquiry into President Bill Clinton's affair with a White House intern.

Since then, the former federal judge and U.S. solicitor general has dedicated himself to conservative causes, including writing briefs for the Mormon church in a previous gay marriage case in California.

Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights in San Francisco, is a transsexual who spent his first 35 years as a female. He was a lead counsel in the state Supreme Court case decided last May that allowed same-sex couples to marry, a ruling that was reversed in November when voters approved Proposition 8.

Starr and Minter will square off Thursday in the most closely watched California Supreme Court hearing in a generation. They're set to deliver oral arguments in three suits in which supporters of gay marriage contend that Proposition 8, which limits marriage to a man and a woman, is unconstitutional.

Minter, representing gay rights groups, will be the first attorney to address the court in San Francisco. Starr will deliver the final arguments on behalf of the Yes on 8 campaign.

Gay rights groups, the city of San Francisco and other local governments contend that Proposition 8 is not an amendment to the state constitution, but an illegal revision that should not have been placed on the ballot without the Legislature's approval.

Minter calls Thursday's proceedings "much bigger" than the case last May that invalidated Proposition 22; approved in 2000, it also limited marriage to a man and a woman.

"This is now about whether a majority can take away an inalienable right from one group of Californians," Minter said. "If the court were to say it's OK … then no one's rights would mean very much."

Starr did not respond to interview requests. But his co-counsel, Folsom attorney Andrew Pugno, disagreed with Minter's contention that Proposition 8 should never have been on the ballot.

"Minority rights exist only because the majority decided to protect them by adopting a constitution," Pugno said. "If the court misinterprets those rights, it's the people's job to correct that by clarifying the constitution."

In court papers, Starr contends that voters have the power to define marriage under the state constitution and that the court must accept their decision.

"Proposition 8's brevity is matched by its clarity," he wrote. "There are no conditional clauses, exceptions, exemptions or exclusions."

State Attorney General Jerry Brown, whose office will represented in court by attorney Christopher Krueger, is challenging Proposition 8 – but on different legal grounds from Minter.

Brown contends that the California Constitution declares certain rights to be fundamental, such as liberty and equality, and that the court held in last year's case that marriage was one of those rights.

The attorney general maintains that legal protections given to minorities and others can be taken away only if the state can show there is a "compelling interest." Proposition 8, Brown said, lacks that compelling interest.

In his court papers, Starr accuses Brown of overreaching with his legal argument.

"We will not mince words," he wrote. "The attorney general is inviting this court to declare a constitutional revolution."

As solicitor general, Starr argued several cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. Frank Schubert, who managed the Yes on 8 campaign, calls him "one of the nation's top jurists."

"He brings an extraordinary degree of credibility on constitutional law, which is ultimately what this case hinges on – whether or not people have the right to amend our constitution," Schubert said.

Like Starr, Minter was born in a small Texas town. But Jenny Pizer, Minter's co-counsel, quipped, "One would hardly say these two are cut from the same cloth."


Call Aurelio Rojas, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 326-5545.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older