Slideshow Loading
previous next
  • ERHARDT KRAUSE / Bee file, 2000

    Platform Irene is set about 4.5 miles off the California coast at Santa Maria, near Vandenberg Air Force Base. Oil producer PXP wants to use high-tech drilling equipment to siphon naturally escaping oil and send it back through Platform Irene and its network of existing pipelines.

  • ERHARDT KRAUSE / Bee file, 2000

    Control room operators work on Platform Irene, an oil platform off the California coast. Environmentalists brokered a deal with an oil producer in hopes of limiting environmental damage from plans to drill there, but a host of other environmental groups strongly oppose the idea. The oil company vows to keep pushing.

  • BRIAN BAER / Bee file, 2009

    Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, R-Irvine, authored a bill to approve the drilling plan, which he called a "good deal." It failed in the Assembly, however.

Capitol and California
Comments (0) | | Print

Offshore drilling debate won't end with budget accord

Published: Sunday, Aug. 2, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 3A

From the perspective of many California environmentalists, the proposed offshore oil drilling project at Tranquillon Ridge in Santa Barbara County is like a movie monster that fails to die.

After all, the drilling proposal – made a part of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's legislative budget package – was soundly rejected by members of the state Assembly on July 24.

Before that, the plan was given the heave-ho not once but twice by the State Lands Commission.

And 63 state environmental groups have come forward to oppose the proposal.

Even officials with the Environmental Defense Center in Santa Barbara – the group which brokered the unusual deal with Houston-based Plains Exploration and Production Co. (PXP) – say they can no longer support the plan as long as it remains a legislative football.

David Landecker, the center's executive director, defended the arrangement with PXP, but said the EDC could not support the governor's attempts to legislatively override the authority of the State Lands Commission, which has considered oil-drilling lease proposals in California since 1938.

But in the face of all that criticism and political heat, advocates of the PXP plan promise that it will be back.

They say rethinking the 40-year moratorium banning oil drilling off California's petroleum-rich shores makes good sense for an energy-thirsty, deficit-plagued state that continues to teeter on the edge of insolvency.

"I predict this proposal will keep coming back before us as long as California continues to suffer from a structural imbalance in our budget," said state Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, R-Irvine, the author of the defeated bill, AB 23. "If you want to see fewer rigs off our coast, then you should join me in supporting this plan. It's a good deal."

DeVore, who is taking on U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer in 2010, said that the plan might come back before state lawmakers as soon as this December or January, when some observers say the state may find itself facing another multibillion-dollar deficit.

"If not then, it'll be the next time after that," DeVore said.

Joe Sparano, president of the Western States Petroleum Association, an oil industry group, said he was disappointed by the Assembly's action.

"We think this is mostly a public education issue," Sparano said. "Our industry is extremely safety-conscious. Since 1970, an estimated 1 billion barrels of oil have been produced out of California waters. In all that time, only 850 barrels have been spilled. While any spill is unfortunate, we think our industry has an excellent safety record. We hope, going forward, that people will give this proposal a second look."

Of course, in the back of the minds of many opposed to the proposal looms the memory of the 1969 Union Oil Platform A blowout.

The accident caused some 80,000 to 100,000 barrels of oil to be spilled into the Santa Barbara Channel, fouling some 150 miles of coastline in the process.

The disaster prompted officials to declare a moratorium on any new oil drilling in state waters – a ban that's been in effect now for four decades.

The PXP proposal is unusual because it was brokered by the Environmental Defense Center, Get Oil Out and other well-known Santa Barbara-based environmental groups. The groups agreed to lobby and promote the deal through the regulatory process in exchange for agreements from PXP to limit the number of years of drilling at the site (not more than 14 years), eliminate four offshore rigs, scrub greenhouse gas emissions and convey to the state some 4,000 acres of shore processing-facility land.

Financially, PXP pledged to fill state coffers with an immediate $100 million advance against future royalties, plus an estimated $1.8 billion to $2 billion in royalties over the life of the project.

The oil-rich Tranquillon Ridge area is situated off Vandenberg Air Force Base in northern Santa Barbara County. Currently, thousands of barrels of oil are naturally draining from the area under state jurisdiction and into federally controlled waters.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover