Our Towns - Folsom/El Dorado News
Comments (0) |

El Dorado County to look at alternatives to recycling center site

Published: Thursday, Aug. 28, 2008 | Page 6F

El Dorado County officials agreed to examine alternatives to the proposed site for a new recycling center strongly opposed by residents and businesses in the Diamond Springs area.

The call for other options came last week as the Board of Supervisors reviewed a consultant's study of solid waste rates and services in the county.

El Dorado County is under pressure to reduce the amount of materials going into landfills. It meets the current state requirement to recycle or compost 50 percent of solid waste. But proposed legislation would increase the diversion rate to 60 percent by December 2012 and to 75 percent by Jan. 1, 2020, said Gerri Silva, environmental management director.

To achieve the higher diversion rates, a study by the consulting firm NewPoint Group concludes that the county must enhance its curbside recycling programs and update waste management facilities, including the west slope recycling center.

A plan by Waste Connections Inc., the franchise company serving much of western El Dorado County, to relocate and upgrade its recycling center, known as a materials recovery facility or MRF, has met with an outpouring of opposition from Diamond Springs residents who object to the proposed 17-acre site on Industrial Drive.

"I don't think it's proper for the county of El Dorado to be held hostage by a monopoly," Leonard Stroud, president of the citizens group Residents Involved in Positive Planning Inc., told the supervisors.

The group formed to fight the project, and Stroud said about 3,400 residents and 147 businesses had signed petitions opposing the Industrial Drive site.

They argue that the property is surrounded by homes, schools, churches and businesses, and trucks traveling to and from a recycling facility would significantly increase traffic on heavily traveled Missouri Flat Road.

Dave Machado, a member of the county Planning Commission, called for the board to take the leadership role in determining the best place for the facility, rather than leaving it to the franchise company.

Stroud and several other residents urged the supervisors to locate it at the former Union Mine Landfill and to use methane from the former county dump to generate electrical power for the recycling operation.

Diamond Springs resident Bob Smart said the county needs to determine where the refuse comes from and where it goes after it is collected.

"I would hope you would include some kind of transportation study," he said. "Where is the center of mass? I would guess it isn't in Diamond Springs, but further down the hill."

Smart suggested establishing small materials recovery facilities tailored to various geographic areas. A facility in the Camino area, for example, could deal with waste from the forested area and use biomass for fuel, he said.

Supervisor Norma Santiago said the goal is to improve the county's diversion rate with the least impact on residents.

She called for extending the three-cart collection system – with separate carts for trash, recyclable materials and yard waste – wherever possible.

Santiago also requested an analysis of the costs and benefits of the county, rather than a franchise company, owning the materials recovery facility.

"We need to look at this as an opportunity to move the county into newer technologies," she said.

Supervisor Helen Baumann said there may be limitations on the use of the Union Mine Landfill.

She noted that the county is using methane to produce electricity at the former dump, but the methane supply will be exhausted at some point.

Supervisor Jack Sweeney said an analysis of the Union Mine site should include cost estimates for road improvements that would be needed to handle the anticipated truck traffic.

Silva, the environmental management director, said she would report to the board Oct. 7 on the potential for expanding curbside recycling.

The board also directed her to provide information Oct. 28 on possible designs and alternative sites for a new recycling facility.


Call The Bee's Cathy Locke, (916) 608-7451.

Dear Readers,

Thank you for coming to sacbee.com. We welcome your participation in our commenting boards and forums, but we ask that you follow a few simple rules to keep the boards open and the discourse civil.

We reserve the right to delete comments that contain inappropriate links, obscenities or vulgarities, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, plagiarism or copyright violations. You can help notify us of potential abuses by flagging comments that you find offensive. Action will be taken against users who repeatedly or flagrantly violate the rules. Keep it clean and you should have no problems.

tool name

close
 
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older