Capitol and California - Government/Politics
Comments (0) | | Print

In the water deal

Published: Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009 - 12:23 am | Page 20A
Last Modified: Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009 - 1:37 pm

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PLAN

Authorizes an $11.14 billion bond measure to pay for dams, underground water banking, water recycling, Delta restoration and dozens of regional projects.

The California Legislature's water package calls for an election, probably in November 2010, on an $11 billion water bond requiring majority approval by the state's voters.

Regarding the peripheral canal, the plan would:

Provide assurances about a proposed Delta water diversion canal. It would prevent the Department of Water Resources from starting construction until the Water Resources Control Board approves a diversion permit for the project.

That diversion permit must specify 'flow criteria' that set new stream-flow requirements to improve Delta habitat.

Water contractors must sign contracts to pay for the canal project and to offset property tax losses to Delta counties.

The canal, as proposed by the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, must help endangered species recover, as required by the Natural Communities Conservation Plan, a higher standard than species protection, called for by current federal rules. Without this enhanced standard, state funding can't flow.

The plan would also:

Create new Delta Stewardship Council, which must prepare a comprehensive, long-term "Delta Plan" by Jan. 1, 2012. The council can require state agencies to follow the Delta Plan.

Reform the existing Delta Protection Commission so that it expands Delta recreation; promotes agriculture; seeks federal status for the Delta as a "place of special significance"; and promotes emergency preparedness, appropriate land use and strategic levee investments.

Create Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy, which will receive funds and make grants for habitat restoration activities from a pool of $2 billion set aside for Delta sustainability, restoration and conservation projects. This can include flood protection projects and ecosystem restoration associated with Bay Delta Conservation Plan. However, no bond money may be used for canal planning, construction, operation, maintenance.

In Sacramento and Northern California, the water package would:

Affirm existing legal protections for upstream water diversions; also affirm state law allowing those diversions to be modified.

Provide $400 million for "drought relief" that may pay cities for water that's instead used to improve Delta flows; $250 million for a Klamath River dam removal project (plus up to $20 million to offset Siskiyou County economic impacts); $60 million for salmon migration projects in Sacramento River watershed; and $50 million in matching grants to improve upstream wastewater treatment.

Elsewhere in California, the water package would:

Create a comprehensive strategy to stabilize statewide water deliveries by improving management of Delta resources.

Increase statewide debt load, though half of the bonds can't be sold until after 2015 to minimize negative impacts.

Require 20 percent water conservation statewide by 2020; provide several paths to local water agencies for achieving this; agencies that fail will not be eligible for state water grants.

Call for Department of Water Resources to coordinate water supply and flood protection between state and federal projects.

Provide $1.9 billion for re- gional water management; $1.5 billion for watershed protection projects; $500 million for groundwater protection proj- ects; $500 million for water recycling and conservation for urban and agricultural users.

Require statewide monitoring of groundwater supplies, starting Jan. 1, 2012.

Add 25 employees to State Water Resources Control Board, to police illegal water diversions.

For water exporters, the package would:

Set "Two Gates" as $28 million, "early action" project by Delta Stewardship Council. The project would build two movable gates on central Delta channels, regulating flows to stabilize water exports.

Require the Delta Stewardship Council to "promote a more reliable water supply" as part of the Delta Plan.

Provide a path to construction of a Delta water diversion canal, even though it gives limited oversight to Delta Stewardship Council.

Allocate $3 billion for potential new dams, but only the "public benefit" portion of those projects, such as ecosystem flows, flood control, rec-reation.

Assure public funding – if voters approve the bond – of habitat restoration in the Delta, which may help stabilize water deliveries.

To read more about Delta issues, visit www.sacbee.com/delta


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover