DEAR CAROLYN: I work in a relatively small office, and one co-worker keeps a large supply of candy on hand. Typically she has a container at her desk and people can help themselves. However, several times a year, she fills an enormous basket with candy and places it along a common walkway – which everyone passes many times a day.
I know you are thinking: And the problem is ... ? The basket appears after several of us commit to follow a diet. It has happened often enough through the years for us to draw a correlation. We know the simple answer is not to take any candy; however, it has begun to grate on our nerves that "Patty" is doing this deliberately. Can we ask her to remove the basket? Should we go to our supervisor? Should we just get a life?
– Candy Philanthropist Or Saboteur?
DEAR CANDY: Option 3 is calling to me, like a basket of bonbons.
It's easy to advocate just talking to Patty, especially when going over her head is your next solution in line. But there's no point in hurting her feelings (or renewing her dedication to sabotage) when there's an easy fourth option – one that doesn't involve Patty-control, but self-control instead.
Skip the candy, duh, of course. But more important: Put the group-dieting idea out of its misery for good.
For one thing, it clearly isn't working. People maintaining healthy weights don't launch group diets with such frequency that behavior patterns emerge – as in, "often enough through the years for us to draw a correlation." Then there's the matter of exclusion. Whenever "several of us" launch a group diet, the remaining colleagues become witnesses to, without opportunity to participate in, a public bonding moment. That is the whole point of a group diet, after all – to support each other toward a common goal. But your office also has a common goal of getting a job done, a goal that cliquishness undermines.
A large office might be able to absorb any number of social subgroups, but in small offices, exclusivity is a morale buster far more serious than some inanimate basket of candy. Simple answer: Summon the willpower to resist clusters of both the social and caramel kind.
DEAR CAROLYN: I have an old friend who's in a very busy time of her life. I've been having some rough times and could have used the support of a good friend in recent months, but she's always been too busy. While she has legitimate demands on her time, I haven't seen her in more than four months, and we live less than four blocks apart.
Now she wants to reconnect. Am I wrong to expect some sort of apology for her lack of commitment to our friendship?
– D.C.
DEAR D.C.: To expect one, yes. To ask for one, no.
If you wait to see if she says the right thing, then you're basically setting her up (and you'd be the one owing her an apology).
If instead you tell her what you're upset about and why, then you'll have been a good friend to her, by being honest. Her response will tell you whether she's a good friend to you. She may be not only apologetic, but also grateful for the chance to do better by you.
About Comments
Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.