Lawyers trade barbs before Davis teen’s murder trial
08/22/2014 1:33 PM
10/08/2014 12:21 PM
Yolo County prosecutors preparing for a Davis teenager’s murder trial hurled misconduct accusations Friday against a public defender before a judge admonished lawyers on both sides to avoid personal attacks.
The scrum happened as the two sides moved toward Monday’s start of Daniel William Marsh’s double-murder trial in Yolo Superior Court. The Davis teenager stands accused of stabbing to death Oliver Northup, 87, and Claudia Maupin, 76, in the bedroom of their south Davis condominium in April 2013.
Marsh, 17, has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to the killings and remains held in Yolo County juvenile custody. He faces a life sentence if convicted.
Prosecutors charged that Marsh’s attorney, Deputy Public Defender Ronald Johnson, intentionally withheld nearly 500 pages of medical and mental health records related to Marsh along with interviews with Marsh’s family. They called on Yolo Superior Court Judge David Reed to sanction Johnson.
“We believe that he did something unethical,” Yolo County Deputy District Attorney Amanda Zambor told Reed.
Johnson countered, arguing that he had been assured by prosecutors that the Yolo County District Attorney’s Office planned to subpoena the documents and that he did not need to provide them. Johnson also cited case law showing that he did not need to turn over other documents and discovery requested by prosecutors.
Reed declined to impose sanctions, but the judge ordered Johnson to provide discovery related to defense expert witnesses to prosecuting attorneys.
Sacto 911 StaffBill Lindelof
More Sacto 911Crimemapper
Send news tips
Sign up for breaking news alerts
Crime Q&ASacramento Bee reporter Cathy Locke answers your questions about crime news, trends and issues. Look up specific cases using Arrest Logs and Sacramento Superior Courts case database.
Submit your question
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.