Sacramento City Council eases restrictions on 'big-box' stores
08/20/2013 8:32 PM
09/05/2013 5:59 PM
The Sacramento City Council eased the city's restrictions of big-box superstores Tuesday night following a contentious two-hour debate that pitted some of the region's top business interests against influential labor leaders.
By a 6-2 vote, the council erased most of a 2006 ordinance that required superstore chains to conduct wage and benefit studies of nearby businesses before being permitted to build new facilities. Complex economic impact studies will also be waived for stores seeking to expand, or open in "food deserts" or some major planned developments.
The City Council chambers were packed for the hearing, with those who opposed easing the restrictions outnumbering those who advocated for easing the restrictions by a 2-1 margin.
Labor leaders, small business representatives and neighborhood activists urged the council to keep the 2006 ordinance in place. Many of those speakers were greeted with applause by members of the audience after speaking.
Building trades group and business organizations led the push to ease the restrictions.
Council members Kevin McCarty and Darrell Fong voted against easing the restrictions. Councilwoman Bonnie Pannell abstained from the vote.
About This BlogRyan Lillis has covered the city of Sacramento, its 108 neighborhoods and its politicians since 2008. Prior to that, he covered crime at The Sacramento Bee. A native of upstate New York, Lillis has a journalism degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
Contact reporter Ryan Lillis at firstname.lastname@example.org or 916-321-1085. Twitter: @Ryan_Lillis.
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.