Communities not prepared for risks of crude oil train derailments, Congress told
04/09/2014 3:22 PM
04/10/2014 3:29 AM
Emergency response officials told a Senate subcommittee Wednesday that big cities and small towns alike are unprepared for a disaster on the scale of an oil train derailment and fire last year in Quebec that destroyed part of a town and killed 47 people.
The hearing was only the second on Capitol Hill in recent weeks that sought the perspective of local officials. The federal government has regulatory authority over rail shipments, but the burden of emergency response ultimately falls on local agencies.
The specter of a large scale crude oil fire and spill has hung over communities across the country since July’s crash in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, where firefighters were simply outmatched by the scale and ferocity of the blaze.
“We can handle everyday emergencies,” said Timothy Pellerin, the fire chief of Rangeley, Maine, whose department assisted in the Quebec derailment. “We’re not prepared for a major disaster like this.”
Urban fire departments may have more resources and personnel, but the scale of the threat is a challenge for them, too. Barb Graff, director of the Seattle Office of Emergency Management, said that three loaded crude oil trains a week pass through the city now, but the frequency could increase to three per day when refineries are able to receive them.
“There’s an imbalance when we increase the hazard,” she testified, “but we don’t increase the ability of the local community to deal with that hazard.”
The hearing in the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies, was led by Sens. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Susan Collins, R-Maine. Crude oil shipments not only cross both states in trains, but they also cross the border into Canada on North America’s virtually seamless rail network.
Pellerin’s department was one of seven in Maine to assist in Lac-Megantic. He testified that crossing the border into Canada, he could see the plumes of smoke 30 miles away.
They were confronted by multiple problems on arrival. He testified that his radios were not compatible with Canadian frequencies, nor were fire hose couplings in sync, either. And the Maine firefighters needed an interpreter because their Quebec colleagues only spoke French.
Pellerin said that 8,000 gallons of firefighting foam had to be trucked in from a refinery in Toronto, which took several hours.
Neither the railroad nor the oil companies involved in the derailment had a disaster plan, he said. He also said that he learned only two weeks ago that the crude oil in the tank cars had been improperly identified.
Pellerin said that three railroad representatives arrived in Lac-Megantic on the day of the derailment, took some pictures and left. The company filed for bankruptcy and was sold in December.
“They need to be held responsible for it,” he testified.
Graff said that regional emergency managers met with representatives of BNSF Railway recently to discuss the impact of crude oil shipments in Washington state. BNSF, based in Fort Worth, Texas, is the nation’s largest hauler of crude oil in trains and operates routes through Washington state’s major population centers.
Acccording to a map of BNSF crude oil terminals, the railroad serves four in Washington, with two more in development. Murray said that the shipments are expected to triple to 55 million barrels this year, and that’s “only the tip of the iceberg.”
Seattle Mayor Ed Murray signed a resolution last month that presses railroads to disclose the volume, frequency and contents of shipments. They are not required to do so currently. The resolution also calls for an “aggressive” phaseout of older model tank cars known as DOT-111s, which were known to be vulnerable to punctures and ruptures in derailments well before they were pressed into service hauling crude oil and ethanol.
When asked when his department would finish new regulations for tank cars, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, told the panel, “We are not going to wait until 2015,” but wouldn’t commit to a specific date. The pace of the rulemaking has frustrated lawmakers on Capitol Hill, as well as state and local officials.
Murray said lawmakers would continue to press the department to move swiftly.
“We certainly are not dropping this topic,” she said. “This is an issue that has to be addressed.”
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.