Capitol Alert

The go-to source for news on California policy and politics

Brown keeps mostly mum on teacher tenure ruling

07/23/2014 5:29 PM

07/24/2014 9:07 AM

In his first public comments on the controversial Vergara v. California ruling that struck down teacher tenure laws in June, Gov. Jerry Brown offered little insight into his thinking on the ruling.

At a press conference Wednesday afternoon, he said only that Attorney General Kamala Harris had on Monday filed a request for additional information from the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

Brown said the state will wait to see the court’s response to its request before taking any other steps, such as an appeal.

“You haven’t heard from me because I haven’t said anything,” he told a reporter who noted he had not yet commented on the ruling.

The attorney general’s request for a statement of decision covers 22 pages and asks Judge Rolf Michael Treu to explain the factual and legal justification for his decison in the final ruling. Among dozens of other questions, it asks the court to provide evidence for its finding that the laws challenged in the suit create negative educational outcomes for poor and minority students in particular, thus violating their civil rights.

In his tentative ruling in favor of the plaintiffs – nine public school students sponsored by education nonprofit Students Matter – Treu struck down laws providing for a two-year probationary period before teachers can receive tenure, the layoff of teachers in order of seniority without regard for teaching performance and 45 or 90-day notices before dismissal for unsatisfactory performance or unprofessional conduct. Teachers’ unions charge that the ruling eliminates job security for teachers.

The plaintiffs have also filed a request for a statement of decision, according to Students Matter spokesman Manny Rivera.

Jonathan Goldman, spokesman for the California Teachers Association, said his organization, a co-defendant in the case, had filed its own request in addition to the state’s. Goldman noted that the judge’s 16-page ruling was brief considering that the trial spanned two months.

“The decision didn’t go into a lot of detail about why,” Goldman said. “For anybody to move forward with an appeal, or anything else, all parties need to know why.”

Capitol Alert staff

Amy Chance
Political editor
achance@sacbee.com
@Amy_Chance

Dan Smith
Capitol bureau chief
smith@sacbee.com
@DanielSnowSmith

Jim Miller
California policy and politics
Capitol Alert editor
jmiller@sacbee.com
@jimmiller2

David Siders
Brown administration
dsiders@sacbee.com
@davidsiders

Christopher Cadelago
California politics and health care
ccadelago@sacbee.com
@ccadelago

Laurel Rosenhall
Legislature, lobbying, higher education
lrosenhall@sacbee.com
@LaurelRosenhall

Jeremy B. White
Legislature
jwhite@sacbee.com
@capitolalert

Alexei Koseff
Insider Edition editor
akoseff@sacbee.com
@akoseff

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service