Capitol Alert

The go-to source for news on California policy and politics

Sen. Rod Wright’s sentencing hearing gets delayed, again

09/03/2014 9:48 AM

10/08/2014 12:17 PM

A Los Angeles judge on Wednesday granted a fourth delay in the sentencing hearing for suspended state Sen. Rod Wright, who was found guilty in January of eight felonies for lying about where he lived when he ran for office in 2008.

The sentencing hearing scheduled for today was delayed until Sept. 12, Judge Kathleen Kennedy ruled. Wright’s lawyers, who have asked the court to toss the jury’s guilty verdicts and grant a new trial, sought the delay to allow more time to review the prosecution’s arguments against their motion for a new trial.

“Judge said today’s request (for a delay) is the last she will grant,” Jane Robison, a spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office wrote in an email to The Bee.

In a brief phone interview, Wright said both sides have asked for delays since the jury’s verdict in January.

“I’m gearing up to go back next week and face what we’ve got to deal with,” Wright said.

State law requires legislative candidates to live in the districts they seek to represent. Prosecutors accuse Wright of lying about where he lived – arguing that he lived in Baldwin Hills when he filed paperwork to run for office that stated his legal address was a home in Inglewood. A jury found him guilty of perjury and voting fraud, and prosecutors asked the judge to send Wright to jail for six months. The Senate suspended him from all duties as a lawmaker in March but maintained his pay pending a final outcome of the trial.

Wright argues that he met all legal requirements to run for office representing the Inglewood area and was permitted to use as his official address the Inglewood home he has owned since the 1970s. The Democratic lawmaker’s attorneys have asked for a new trial, arguing that the prosecution wrongly instructed the jury to consider where Wright “lives” in the colloquial sense, not where he has his “domicile,” a legal term of art that lies at the center of the case.

Editor’s note: This post was updated at 4:40 p.m. to include Wright’s response.

Capitol Alert staff

Amy Chance
Political editor
achance@sacbee.com
@Amy_Chance

Dan Smith
Capitol bureau chief
smith@sacbee.com
@DanielSnowSmith

Jim Miller
California policy and politics
Capitol Alert editor
jmiller@sacbee.com
@jimmiller2

David Siders
Brown administration
dsiders@sacbee.com
@davidsiders

Christopher Cadelago
California politics and health care
ccadelago@sacbee.com
@ccadelago

Laurel Rosenhall
Legislature, lobbying, higher education
lrosenhall@sacbee.com
@LaurelRosenhall

Jeremy B. White
Legislature
jwhite@sacbee.com
@capitolalert

Alexei Koseff
Insider Edition editor
akoseff@sacbee.com
@akoseff

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service