Dan Walters: Brown gets win on prisons, but political angst continues
02/10/2014 5:32 PM
10/06/2014 6:57 PM
Gov. Jerry Brown has contended for months that the state could reduce severe overcrowding in the state’s prisons through creative management, without releasing felons that might endanger the public.
Federal judges who have been pressuring California gave Brown a big victory Monday by acknowledging the reductions to date and giving the state two more years to reach the population goal of 137.5 percent of design capacity.
The state is about 5,500 inmates above that level now, but the sharp inmate drop of the past few years, 27,000, would seem to make the goal a piece of cake.
There are, however, caveats in the three-judge panel’s order, and there’s continuing political angst over what the state is doing to reduce overcrowding.
The judges told Brown that he cannot ship more inmates to out-of-state prisons, and ordered immediate adoption of looser parole standards for ill, elderly and low-risk inmates.
Brown has maintained that he would not agree to wholesale inmate releases, but the state has already loosened up parole standards somewhat and would go further under the order.
Therefore, some older felons who’ve spent decades behind bars for heinous crimes would, in fact, be freed on assumption that they pose no risk.
The centerpiece of inmate reduction has been “realignment” under which felons deemed to pose minimal risk are diverted into local supervision and rehabilitation programs aimed at reducing a historically high rate of recidivism.
The state has seen an uptick in crime rates lately, and critics of realignment say it’s because thousands of felons who otherwise would have been locked up are roaming the streets, and local sheriffs are freeing lesser miscreants to make room for felons.
State officials insist that realignment is blameless in the crime spurt, and are backed by pro-realignment groups such as the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, which sees “no conclusive trends demonstrating a causal relationship between realignment and crime.”
But Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich, a harsh critic, said in a recent letter to the editor that “of the 19,000 offenders shifted to probation supervision in Los Angeles County, 24,742 arrests were made for new offenses,” and he’s backed by the anti-realignment Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which cites crimes as serious as murder being committed by “realigned felons.”
A new analysis by the Public Policy Institute of California declares, “Strong evidence suggests that changes in incarceration caused by realignment increased property crime somewhat, especially motor vehicle thefts, but ﬁnds no evidence that the most serious crimes, murder and rape, have increased as a result of realignment.”
As Brown tries to obey the courts, therefore, the political controversy shows no signs of abating.
About This BlogDan Walters' column appears in dozens of California newspapers. He joined the Sacramento Union’s Capitol bureau in 1975 and in 1981 began writing the state’s only daily newspaper column devoted to California political, economic and social events. He and the column moved to The Sacramento Bee in 1984. Contact him at email@example.com or 916-321-1195. Twitter: @WaltersBee
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.