Dan Walters: Will two big school overhauls pass the test?
03/23/2014 12:00 AM
03/22/2014 11:15 PM
California is embarking on two massive overhauls of its 6 million-pupil public school system – one of financing, the other of curriculum – with a proclaimed goal of improving the state’s poor academic outcomes.
One, pushed by Gov. Jerry Brown, shifts more money to school districts with large numbers of poor or English-learner students to narrow what’s called the “achievement gap.”
At Brown’s behest, the State Board of Education is giving districts considerable leeway on how the money is to be spent, spurning fears of civil-rights groups and school reformers that districts may not concentrate it on the targeted kids.
Brown calls that “subsidiarity” – the doctrine that decisions should be made at the lowest practical level.
Simultaneously, California is shifting its statewide curriculum to a nationwide template called Common Core, aimed at establishing high achievement standards and moving emphasis from absorbing facts to critical analysis.
Together, the two overhauls represent another chapter in California’s perennial search for magic solutions to its educational dilemma, a quest that has ranged from lowering class sizes to empowering parents to take over schools that do poorly in standardized academic testing.
This month, having obtained a federal waiver, the state school board suspended the test-driven school performance measure known as API for at least two years. And that means parents and others will have no way, at least temporarily, of judging which schools are doing well and which are failing.
The rationale is that it makes no sense to make qualitative judgments until Common Core is in place and a new assessment system, which will be field-tested in some districts this spring, is in place.
Supposedly, the API will be overhauled – reducing academic testing’s role in scores, adding other factors and aligning it with Common Cause. But whether the revised API, which is to emerge next year, will be a valuable guide to parents remains to be seen.
That uncertainty is driven by the very evident opposition to comparative assessments from Brown and the powerful California Teachers Association.
Brown denounced testing in a speech to this month’s state Democratic convention as an impediment to effective teaching while the CTA dislikes using test results as a basis for judging teacher competency, arguing that external factors such as poverty and parental involvement play equally powerful roles in outcomes.
There is some validity to both positions. Teaching to the test is obviously not healthy, and other factors certainly do affect learning.
However, without some objective measure of achievement over time, we’ll have no way of judging whether Brown’s money shift and Common Core really have some positive effect, or are just two more failed panaceas.
About This BlogDan Walters' column appears in dozens of California newspapers. He joined the Sacramento Union’s Capitol bureau in 1975 and in 1981 began writing the state’s only daily newspaper column devoted to California political, economic and social events. He and the column moved to The Sacramento Bee in 1984. Contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org or 916-321-1195. Twitter: @WaltersBee
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.