Dan Walters

Observations on California and its politics

Dan Walters: New water bond could make Delta tunnels unnecessary

08/17/2014 12:00 AM

10/08/2014 12:13 PM

As Gov. Jerry Brown and legislative leaders hammered out a water bond deal last week, one very high priority was making it “tunnel-neutral.”

In a way, that’s a bit odd, since Brown has hoped that boring twin water tunnels beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta would be one of his legacies.

However, the decades-old proposal to bypass the Delta in water deliveries to the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California is highly controversial, and were the bond measure’s projects to be obviously connected, it could easily doom passage on Nov. 4.

Notwithstanding the artful drafting, some opponents of the project still see a connection and may mount a campaign along those lines against the bond if they can raise some serious campaign money.

Considering the $7.5 billion water package as a whole, including a new $7.1 billion bond, an argument could be made, however, that it reduces the need for the tunnels, perhaps to the point of eliminating it.

The tunnels would not, as their critics allege, greatly increase the amount of Northern California water shipped southward.

Their primary purpose would be to increase the reliability of those transfers to San Joaquin Valley farms and Southern California’s thirsty hordes by bypassing the environmentally damaged Delta.

Quietly, however, Southern California’s water agencies, principally those receiving water via the region’s Metropolitan Water District, have been increasing local reliability and reducing their long-term need for Northern California water.

They’ve built new reservoirs and expanded old reservoirs; the San Diego County Water Authority just added 152,000 acre-feet by raising one of its dams, for example.

They’ve instituted strict conservation programs. And they’ve sought new sources, such as treating wastewater to drinking water standards, cleaning up polluted groundwater, capturing storm runoff, and even desalinating seawater.

The new water package contains $2.7 billion for more storage to serve statewide needs, but one proposed project could supply San Joaquin Valley farms without involving the Delta.

The rest of the package is very oriented toward grants to local and regional water agencies to capture more, store more, conserve more, and treat more, thus improving reliability and indirectly reducing reliance on the Delta and pressure on its fragile environment.

As the Delta’s role in California’s water supply picture diminishes, it not only reduces the hydrological rationale for the tunnels, but the financial one as well.

The big agricultural and municipal water agencies that have informally pledged to pay for the tunnels were already having trouble justifying their immense cost, given their small projected water yield. The improved supply and reliability from a “tunnel-neutral” water bond could tip the financial equation against them.

About This Blog

Dan Walters' column appears in dozens of California newspapers. He joined the Sacramento Union’s Capitol bureau in 1975 and in 1981 began writing the state’s only daily newspaper column devoted to California political, economic and social events. He and the column moved to The Sacramento Bee in 1984. Contact him at dwalters@sacbee.com or 916-321-1195. Twitter: @WaltersBee

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service