Read the letter from 25 local officials opposing Chuck Reed’s public pension proposal
11/29/2013 9:29 AM
11/29/2013 9:30 AM
In case you missed it, this week’s State Worker column reports on a new twist in the ongoing tussle over San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed’s public pension proposal: some local officials oppose the idea.
Reed has argued that local governments, whose budgets are particularly susceptible to pension-cost hikes, need the clear authority to prospectively cut benefits for current employees. His measure, aimed for the November 2014 ballot, would let them do that (while leaving accrued benefits unchanged). The letter, released by a union coalition fighting Reed’s ballot proposal, is designed to chip away at that assertion. Here’s the letter:
With just 400 to 450 words for our weekly State Worker column, much of what we learn each week never sees print. Column Extras give you some of the notes, the quotes, the documents and the observations that inform what's published.
About This BlogJon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at email@example.com or 916-321-1043. Twitter: @TheStateWorker.
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.