Read the Detroit bankruptcy ruling
12/09/2013 12:46 PM
12/09/2013 1:09 PM
Here’s the 150-page decision in the Detroit bankruptcy case, which has the distinction of being the first-ever court decision that says promised public-employee pension benefits can be reduced via municipal bankruptcy. Worth noting: States cannot declare bankruptcy.
Also worth noting: Mayor Chuck Reed’s measure, which among other things would change the California constitution to allow prospective public pension reductions, applies to both state and local governments. Conventional legal wisdom has always held that the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and California’s constitition (which is remarkably similar to Michigan’s in this area) say that public pensions are contracts that can’t be altered once promised. The Detroit ruling says that bankruptcy law is all about breaking contracts.
“... nothing distinguishes pension debt in a municipal bankruptcy case from any other debt,” wrote Detroit bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes. “If the Tenth Amendment prohibits the impairment of pension benefits in this case, then it would also prohibit the adjustment (of) any other debt in this case.”
Here’s the full ruling. The pension discussion picks up on page 73:
About This BlogJon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org or 916-321-1043. Twitter: @TheStateWorker.
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.