The State Worker

Jon Ortiz chronicles civil-service life for California state workers

From the notebook: What CalPERS officials said about restricted trades now under SEC review

12/30/2013 10:46 AM

02/26/2014 11:34 AM

In case your missed it, The Bee reported this weekend that federal officials are looking into two stock purchases that CalPERS made in mid March in violation of its own policy to avoid insider trades. Although a subsequent internal review determined that the trades were accidental and weren’t really insider trades, sources say that the Securities and Exchange Commission has been conducting a low-level, informal inquiry.

Neither the SEC nor CalPERS has publicly commented on the federal review.

CalPERS did refer to the trades on page 13 of this monthly investment report. During the fund’s May 13, 2013, board meeting CalPERS’ board member J.J. Jelincic noted the “policy violations” entries and asked Carol Moody about them. Moody is the fund’s senior portfolio manager responsible for, among other things, developing and monitoring investment-management compliance.

A brief discussion of the trades and measures to prevent similar transactions ensued. You can view it at about the 14:14 mark of this archived video:

About This Blog

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at jortiz@sacbee.com or 916-321-1043. Twitter: @TheStateWorker.

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service