The State Worker

January 7, 2014

The State Workers’ Top 10: Furloughs affect leave cash outs

The numbers in a March report confirmed what common sense inferred: Furloughing state workers carried hidden long-term costs.

The State Worker

Jon Ortiz chronicles civil-service life for California state workers

The numbers in a March report confirmed what common sense inferred: Furloughing state workers carried hidden long-term costs.

According to Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor, furloughs cut state payroll costs by about $5 billion since the policy first took hold in fiscal 2008-09. But since state workers on furlough didn’t take as much paid leave time as they otherwise would, their leave balances grew at a quicker clip.

"Probably nearly $1 billion of these furlough savings was not long-term savings," the LAO concluded. "Instead, the state must pay this money as they retire or otherwise leave state service."

Although the state has a 640-hour leave cap, among the nation’s most generous, departments routinely ignore it and allow balances to balloon. That adds to the long-term tab the state owes its departing employees.

Our 5th most-popular post of 2013, Report: California's furloughs driving up leave cash-out costs, included an embedded copy of the LAO’s report on the connection between furloughs and leave balances. The LAO assessment was among the most-viewed documents embedded on The State Worker last year, with more than 33,000 reads via Scribd.

This post is the latest installment in a series counting down the most-viewed State Worker blog posts of 2013.

Related content

Comments

 

Videos

Editor's Choice Videos