The State Worker

Jon Ortiz chronicles civil-service life for California state workers

Column Extra poll: Should California state payroll project aim lower?

03/20/2014 10:11 AM

03/20/2014 10:25 AM

Our State Worker column this week looks at a tension confronting the state’s stalled payroll overhaul: An audit of the MyCalPays Project (A.K.A. the 21st Century Project) project could yield invaluable lessons that would benefit nearly three dozen state IT projects in the pipeline, but it could also jeopardize its lawsuit against tech vendor SAP. The Legislative Analyst’s report that raised that issue also suggests that the state reassess whether it needs a universal payroll system for California’s vast, diverse bureaucracy. From the report:

Due to recent events, it is unclear whether integrating all of the state’s payroll systems, as envisioned in the (21st Century) Project, is feasible. Payroll practices can vary significantly across state departments, and some departments, such as the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, have particularly complex payroll needs that complicate the state’s ability to integrate these systems. This option would assess updating payroll systems in a decentralized fashion that integrates less complex payroll departments together and considers alternative approaches for modernizing the payroll systems of complex departments.

What do you think? Take our poll.

About This Blog

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at or 916-321-1043. Twitter: @TheStateWorker.


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service