Members file rebuttal to CalPERS' argument that long-term care lawsuit should be thrown out
04/30/2014 11:50 AM
04/30/2014 11:52 AM
A small band of CalPERS long-term care policyholders have again blasted the system and its leadership in court documents that allege dishonestly and mismanagement of the private insurance program have led to soaring rate hikes planned for next year.
Aside from reinforcing charges made in an earlier court filing that CalPERS has since rebutted, the new documents filed last week in Los Angeles County Superior Court toss in some new arguments for the court to intervene.
Among them: The “evidence of coverage” document given to policyholders is a contract that allows for rate changes, not rate increases. And when CalPERS says that it is raising rates to compensate for higher-than-expected costs for plans that increase maximum coverage by a compounded 5 percent annually, the fund is violating a provision of the contract that says “Your premium will not increase as a result of these annual benefit increases.”
In a separate court filing, the plaintiffs allege that Towers Watson, the outside underwriter for the long-term care policies, negligently advised CalPERS to misprice premiums.
The lawsuit was triggered by CalPERS’ decision last year to increase the rates of its lifetime and inflation-adjusted long-term care policies by 85 percent in 2015 and 2016. The plaintiffs want the court to grant class-action status to their complaint and prevent CalPERS from raising rates.
About This BlogJon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at email@example.com or 916-321-1043. Twitter: @TheStateWorker.
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.