Editorial on Benghazi is arbitrary

01/03/2014 7:10 AM

01/02/2014 1:34 PM

Re "Issa squanders position with his bombast" (Editorials, Dec. 31): Other than just believing what it wants to believe, what other basis does The Bee Editorial Board have for believing the New York Time's piece on Benghazi over Rep. Darrell Issa's congressional hearings? If the White House were to release the facts about Benghazi rather than stonewalling Congress and the American people, perhaps we all would know what really happened. Perhaps, then the board would have a basis for its opinion other than bias.

-- Joe Phelan, Lincoln

Editor's Choice Videos


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service