Limiting malpractice damages is unfair
01/10/2014 10:10 AM
01/10/2014 8:52 AM
Re “Jahi's fight for life turns political” (Forum, Dan Morain, Jan. 5): Limiting medical malpractice lawsuit damages to $250,000 is well-intended but unrealistic. Surely, we need to reduce medical costs in every way we can. However, such a limit would be unfair for those who suffer on account of gross negligence and incompetence. Larger settlements not only benefit the recipients, but also serve to instill greater levels of caution and responsibility in all medical practice. Perhaps a settlement cap can work if it applies only to those cases in which circumstantial, but no hard evidence of malpractice can be found. Patients also need to be responsible, taking the time to clearly understand the risks of any procedure. Medicine cannot be viewed as a service with iron-clad guarantees.
-- Mike Nofz, Green Lake, Wis.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.