Water conservation should be mandatory

01/20/2014 10:10 AM

01/20/2014 9:58 AM

Re “State of emergency declared in drought” (Page A1, Jan. 18): Gov. Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency regarding the drought, as did the U.S. Department of Agriculture to qualify the state for federal funds and some farmers for low-interest loans. But why is water conservation optional? Many still assume that water will always be there when they turn on their tap, and the governor’s tepid statement does not help that perception. People who depend on well water have already been conserving, but those on public water may need to be encouraged a bit more forcefully. And where in this article is the comparison of water usage for golf courses to that of agriculture? I love an expanse of green grass, too, but I would prefer to see brown grass this summer in exchange for having fresh fruit available for my family. Conservation by all is necessary. -- Ellen Van Dyke, Rescue

Editor's Choice Videos


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service