Rim fire's burned forests deserve salvage
01/24/2014 7:10 AM
01/23/2014 4:15 PM
Re “After fire, leave the forest alone to heal habitat” (Forum, Another View, Jan. 19): I have some questions and concerns regarding Justin Augustine's opinion piece. 1. Do we really want a standing forest of diseased trees, and do we want to establish a food source for bark beetles, encouraging them to move in? Most western lodgepole pine forests have been devastated by beetles. 2. Doesn't it defy common sense and experience to believe that wildlife won’t thrive in logged-over and regenerating forests? 3. Do we really want to waste timber that has salvage value and could put people to work? 4. Do we really want to prevent a new, replanted forest? Justin Augustine's ecological article seems to be just another attempt to stop logging. Thirty years ago, groups like his were saying that spotted owls could only survive in old growth forests.
-- James Peace, Sacramento
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.