Ban outside smoking at restaurants
02/13/2014 10:02 AM
02/14/2014 12:06 PM
Re "Outdoor dining ruined by secondhand smoke" (Viewpoints, Feb. 5): Smoke is not only bad for the smoker but also for the people around them. The op-ed says that "secondhand smoke is a toxic air contaminant." This means that when a smoker smokes it contaminates the air, and the people who get exposed to the air get harmed. This matters because the people around the smoker get harmed and possibly sick. Banning smoke from restaurants won't harm anybody eating at the food place. The op-ed states the "data suggest that there has been no adverse economic impact from smoke-free bar and restaurant laws." This means that banning smoke will only benefit the people. This matters because restaurants can ban smoke without being afraid to lose business.
-- Fatima Fareedi, Sacramento
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.