Asinine ruling in mental illness case

02/14/2014 8:02 AM

02/14/2014 11:56 AM

Re "Judge rejects psych suit" (A1, Feb. 14):

For many years the government has made an attempt to educate the public about mental illness (example are billboards around Sacramento), destigmatize it and increase treatment parity between mental and physical illnesses. It's obvious Judge James C. Mahan didn't get the memo because his decision and explanation is about as asinine as anyone could have imagined. People who are mentally ill may be unable to make decisions for themselves and will go along with whatever someone tells them, and that is coercion. The fact that Mr. Brown had just been released from a psychiatric facility does not mean he was competent to make decisions. Having said that, someone needs to check the mental competency of Judge Mahan because there's apparently something missing. The exploitation of the mentally ill did not start with Mr. Brown but Mahan's decision completely supports it.

-- Mark Collen, Sacramento

Editor's Choice Videos

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service