Deal on plastic bag ban stinks

03/08/2014 10:03 AM

03/07/2014 3:26 PM

Re "Management, labor agree on plastic bag ban" (Viewpoints, March 5): Just when I thought the limits of Sacramento's ethical problems couldn't be stretched any further, Sen. Alex Padilla comes along and proves me wrong.

Lauded as a major environmental protection bill, SB 270 seeks to address a problem that isn't there. Plastic bags account for just 0.4 percent of the nation's municipal solid waste stream and traditionally less than 1 percent of litter. The environmental angle is just a cover for what SB 270: a fleecing of the public.

Padilla has engineered a deal that will put millions of dollars into the pockets of corporate grocers. And, now, a major union has bought into a bill that goes against their core belief: protecting jobs. We know what the grocers are getting out of it, but this must be a sweet deal for the union, too.

The jig is up and this deal stinks.

-- Yianni Lilakopoulos, Sacramento

Editor's Choice Videos

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service